Today was the last day to apply for the Steemit Representative and Booming program. Many users submitted their applications, and I've reviewed them all. I'm writing this post to inform the team about some important facts. Unfortunately, some applicants are trying to deceive the team by pretending to be active and sincere Steemit users.

I've noticed that some users have a history of powering down their Steemit accounts multiple times, only to become active again and collect more power. This behavior is suspicious, and it's mostly users from Pakistan who are doing this.

Furthermore, some applicants have multiple accounts, which is against the rules. They're using their main account to support their other accounts, boosting their content and earning rewards. This is unfair and deceptive.

As a result, these users are trying to manipulate the system and trick the Steemit team. I want to bring this to the team's attention so they can take necessary actions.

I'm questioning the applicants for the Steem Representative and Booming Program. Have they been honest about their past actions? Have they played a positive role in the Steem community?

The truth is, these applicants are the same people who regularly apply for the Monthly Curators program. They've had their communities selected for the Booming Program multiple times, but instead of using it to promote Steem genuinely, they've exploited it to boost their own multiple accounts.

They claim to have done great things for Steem, but that's not true. The Steem team has given them many opportunities to contribute, but their performance has been disappointing. The number of active users in their communities is dwindling, and they're not doing much to promote Steem.

Their promotion efforts are shallow, limited to sharing posts on Twitter and Facebook just to look good. They don't seem to be bringing in new users or encouraging people to participate. Instead, they're just promoting their own multiple accounts.

If you look at their creation reports, you'll see that they're mostly interacting with the same people - themselves! They're not introducing new users to the platform or contributing to its growth. It's time to take a closer look at these applicants and their true intentions.

If someone asks me for proof to back up my claims, I can point to the applicants' own track records. These same individuals apply for the Monthly Curators program every month, and their communities have been selected for the Booming Program year after year. They've participated in numerous Steemit challenges and have been rewarded with thousands of Steem reward.

However, despite their apparent success, their true mission is to grow their multiple accounts and exploit the system for rewards. They're not genuinely promoting Steemit or contributing to its growth. Instead, they're manipulating the system to benefit themselves.

If their performance was genuinely good, we would see active and engaged communities with a steady influx of new users. However, the reality is that many of their communities have stagnant or declining user bases. The active users they do have are often just their own multiple accounts.

It's concerning that these same individuals are applying for multiple roles, including Steemit Representative, Booming Admin, Monthly Curators , and Engagement Challenge. If they're so active and dedicated, why aren't they onboarding new users from their regions and countries? Instead, they seem to be using their multiple accounts to game the system and collect rewards.

Their applications often claim that they've done excellent work promoting Steemit and bringing in new users. However, a closer look reveals that their "excellent work" is often just a matter of exploiting the system through multiple accounts. It's time to take a closer look at these applicants and their true intentions.

Some applicants are using questionable tactics to boost their main accounts. They're earning power from multiple accounts and then transferring it to their main account, making it seem like they've purchased it from the Steem exchange. In reality, they're just shifting Steem from one account to another, exploiting the system for rewards.

It's concerning that the Steemit team seems to be turning a blind eye to this behavior. They're placing trust in applicants who repeatedly create multiple accounts and engage in suspicious activity. I want to offer some advice to the Steemit team to help prevent this kind of exploitation.

Here are some key points to consider

• Eliminate multiple account holders who are using these accounts to game the system.
• Stop applicants who are getting rewards through multiple accounts.
• Implement measures to prevent applicants from transferring Steem between accounts to artificially inflate their power.

By taking these steps, we can promote a more genuine and engaged community on Steemit. We can encourage new users and writers, rather than rewarding those who exploit the system. If we don't address this issue, multiple account holders will continue to dominate the Steemit blockchain, stifling innovation and progress.

To ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process, I propose that the Steemit team requires applicants for roles such as Steam Representative, Booming, Monthly curator, or Monthly Engagement Challenge to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Specifically, applicants should be asked to reveal if they have any close relatives, such as brothers, sisters, parents, or spouses, who are already involved in similar roles or programs.

This information is crucial in preventing the exploitation of multiple accounts and ensuring that applicants are not unfairly advantaged. By asking applicants to disclose their family connections, we can better understand their relationships and potential biases.

For instance, if multiple members of the same family are applying for similar roles, it's likely that they're working together to manipulate the system. By requiring applicants to disclose their family ties, we can identify and prevent such behavior.

To take it a step further, I suggest that the Steemit team implements the following conditions for applicants:

• Disclose any family members or close relatives who are already involved in similar roles or programs.
• Provide information on any potential conflicts of interest or biases.

By implementing these measures, we can promote a more transparent and fair selection process, ensuring that the most deserving applicants are chosen for these roles.

When announcing the selected Steemit users for programs like the Steemit Representative Booming Program, Monthly Creator, or Engagement Program, it's crucial that the Steemit team implements rules and regulations that promote fairness and transparency. I propose that the team considers the rules I've outlined, which aim to prevent the exploitation of multiple accounts and ensure that new users and content writers get the support they deserve.

By implementing these rules, I'm confident that Steemit will become a more inclusive platform where new users can thrive. Currently, many applicants who are selected for these programs use their position to support their own multiple accounts, often in ways that are not immediately apparent. This not only deprives new users of the opportunity to grow but also undermines the integrity of the platform.

To address this issue, I believe that strict yet simple rules are needed to prevent applicants from supporting their multiple accounts. By doing so, we can improve the performance of selected applicants, give rightful owners their due recognition, and promote new users.

It's time for Steemit to revisit its rules and ensure that they're aligned with the platform's goals. By implementing the rules I've proposed, we can create a more level playing field where everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.

Selected applicants for the Steem Representative or Booming program must meet specific requirements. A key condition is that

• They onboard at least 10 new users to Steemit within a month. This involves providing comprehensive guidance on Steemit's rules and regulations, which can be achieved through social media promotions or grassroots efforts in their area. This condition ensures that the applicant's performance is measurable and beneficial to the Steemit community.

• The second condition for Steem Representatives is that they cannot upvote content from their own region, country, or relatives. Instead, they should focus on discovering and upvoting high-quality content from other communities. This ensures that Steem Representatives prioritize promoting excellent content over supporting their own multiple accounts or regional biases. By doing so, we can reward the best content creators globally, rather than just those from their own region or network.

• To ensure fairness and promote quality content, Booming should be used exclusively to upvote content from other countries and communities. A strict condition should be implemented that prohibits Steam Representatives from upvoting content from their own community, region, or country. This will prevent them from artificially boosting their own multiple accounts, which are often created with regional names and content.

By enforcing this condition, Steam Representatives will be incentivized to discover and promote high-quality content from around the world, rather than just supporting their own regional biases. This will lead to a more diverse and globalized content discovery process, where new users and quality content creators from various countries can gain recognition and rewards.

I'm 100% certain that implementing this condition will encourage people to create high-quality content, attract new users, and promote good content in a meaningful way. By taking away the ability to upvote their own region's content, Steam Representatives will focus on finding and promoting the best content globally, which will ultimately benefit the Steemit community as a whole.

• Important Point is , To promote diversity and fairness, selected applicants for the Steam Representative and Booming program should not be allowed to apply for other programs like Monthly Creator or Steemit Engagement. This will provide opportunities for new people to join and contribute to the Steemit community.

If the same individuals are repeatedly selected for multiple roles, it can lead to:

• Lack of opportunities for new users
• Overburdening of selected individuals, potentially resulting in poor performance or fraud
• Inability to do justice to multiple roles and responsibilities

The Steemit team should prioritize providing opportunities to new users and promoting a diverse range of contributors to make Steemit a great platform. By doing so, they can ensure that the platform continues to grow and thrive.

I'd like to bring to the Steemit team's attention that Pakistani applicants have been found to be heavily involved in multiple accounts, exploiting the platform for personal gain. To ensure fairness and transparency, I recommend that the Steemit team thoroughly vet these applicants' accounts and performance, rather than relying solely on their applications.

A review of current applicants reveals that despite numerous opportunities, they've failed to onboard new users from Pakistan or promote Steemit within their area. Their primary focus appears to be on exploiting the system for rewards, with little effort to genuinely promote Steemit or support new users.

The Steemit team can verify this by examining the performance of Pakistani applicants, who seem to be more interested in showcasing their power and rewards than in promoting Steemit or supporting new users. Their social media promotions appear to be superficial, and they haven't made any meaningful efforts to onboard new users despite the potential for online work in Pakistan.

To maintain the integrity of the Steemit platform, I urge the team to take a closer look at Pakistani applicants and consider setting aside their applications for now, given their lack of meaningful contributions to the platform.