You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Representative and Booming Program " Concerns and Proposals"
All very interesting but unless you want to give names and specifics it is of no use.
You have obviously made the effort to create an alternate account to hide your identity so presumably you have no problem with giving more specific details about your accusations.
You also need to work hard on making your posts much briefer and less repetitive.
Estoy de acuerdo. Si existen pruebas que confirmen lo que decimos, ¿para qué ocultarnos con una nueva cuenta? Es bueno señalar a las personas que, en lugar de hacerle bien a la plataforma, la perjudican.
you can see who upvoted the new account.. surprise surprise
Apologize for messaging here.
I believe I have the right to vote on any post on Steemit, and this was one of my random daily votes like I do for others. However, I later noticed that the account was created in 2018, while I joined the Steemit platform in 2021 through my friend. I don't think any further explanation is needed. Have a good day.
Of course, you have the right to vote for whomever you want and like to vote for. But for someone stating he is busy and absent since longer you are very fast with responding. Do you believe in coincedence? And now you show for the second time I am curious about your opinion.
Is there a fair way of distributing booming votes? A lottery or bingo perhaps? Or do you agree with me that if this good intention is abused it's wiser to give up on it?
Steemit inc. or Tron can also decide at Springfestival who deserves a booming vote.
🤷
?
I'm calling out @mohammadfaisal (account using since 2018) for their suspicious activities on Steemit, which seem to involve using AI to generate content and comments. This raises serious concerns about authenticity and fairness.
I'd like to ask @mohammadfaisal directly: How fluent are you in English, and what tools do you use to write your content? Given your history on Steemit since 2018, I have several questions:
Furthermore, I'm concerned about the Steemit team's effectiveness in monitoring and addressing issues related to reward hunting and multi-accounting. It's alarming that individuals with a history of exploiting the system are being given roles and rewards.
As a Steemit user, I urge the team to take a closer look at these individuals' activities and prioritize transparency and fairness. We need to encourage new users and support genuine content creators, rather than rewarding those who exploit the system.
I'll be sharing more information and evidence in future comments. I hope the Steemit team takes my concerns seriously and takes action to address these issues. I'm not targeting any individual Steemit user, but rather advocating for honest and genuine participation. When Steemit offers significant rewards, why not utilize them to drive growth and help new users? Instead of discouraging others, let's focus on practical work that benefits the community.
There's ample evidence of reward hunting in every community and challenge. Rather than demanding proof, let's prioritize tangible efforts that make Steemit better. The focus should be on groundwork and practical contributions, not just reporting.
It's puzzling that the Steemit team isn't demanding more practical work from participants. Many individuals who were once actively contributing have become absent, likely due to the influx of reward hunters.
I urge the Steemit team to wake up and focus on original work rather than just reading applications and reports. Consider the feedback from users and reflect on the past actions of those involved. It's time for a change. Why don't individuals earning $100 rewards, along with their family members, encourage others to join Steemit? The reason is that they're not genuinely supporting or promoting the platform. If more people join, they'll have to share the reward, and these individuals seem more interested in harvesting rewards for themselves.
It's puzzling that the Steemit team hasn't asked these questions: Why can't they onboard new users from their area despite writing elaborate progress reports? Are the accounts they've created solely for reward hunting?
The answers to these questions speak for themselves and validate my concerns. I'm steemit lover
Love to All
@steemcurator01 @steemcurator02
I think you're wrong and @mohammadfaisal and @afzalqamar are two different persons. I constantly communicate with @afzalqamar as a member of my team. He is a completely real person and as an author has a very specific area of interest.
0.00 SBD,
14.61 STEEM,
14.61 SP
I'm inviting those who dismiss these allegations to review the content of @mohammadfaisal, @afzalqamar, and @akmalshakir from 8-9 months ago and compare it with their content after they received positions from the Steemit team. You'll notice a significant difference.
I also asked @mohammadfaisal about his English proficiency and the tools he uses to write content. His response will help clarify whether he's using AI tools or not.
The question remains: Is it permissible to use AI tools to develop content? Should individuals with technical expertise be allowed to create AI-generated content without disclosure?
Let's examine their content, language, and native language to determine if AI is involved. A simple question to the content writer about their English fluency could provide clarity.
This isn't an isolated case; more will come to light. The misuse of power granted by the Steemit team has brought these issues to our attention. We know how the Steemit team operates – they often focus on voting power and then disappear. Now, we're raising our voices against those who misuse their positions.
We're not stopping here; we'll highlight every case and user to create awareness. If the Steemit team doesn't take action, the community has the right to step in and make Steemit better. We won't tolerate vote farming or unjust behavior. We'll also speak out against the Steemit team's unjust actions if necessary.
By doing so, we'll ensure that Steemit is fair for all users, old and new. Those who engage in unjust behavior should know that their actions won't be tolerated. If they fear no consequences, how can we bring justice to others? It's time for accountability and transparency .When a Steemit user applies for a position, they often share their application links on platforms like WhatsApp, Discord, and Telegram, asking people to comment on them. It appears that the decision-makers don't thoroughly review applications, instead relying on these links and favoring applicants based on personal relationships rather than merit. I'm steemit lover
Love to All
@steemcurator01 @steemcurator02 @wakeupkitty @stmpak.wit
Several questions remain unanswered regarding the activities of certain users on Steemit. Specifically:
Observations suggest that these accounts are interconnected, with Faisal potentially writing content and managing them. There's also a history of campaigns against him for alleged vote farming and reward hunting.
Furthermore, instead of supporting new users from their region, these individuals seem to discourage them. This raises concerns about their intentions and the Steemit team's oversight.
My question to the Steemit team is: Are these activities beneficial or harmful to the platform? If no action is taken, it may appear that the team is condoning these behaviors. I believe transparency and accountability are essential to maintaining a fair and healthy community.To those defending these account holders, do you know the relationship between @mohammadfaisal, @afzalqamar, and @akmalshakir? Are you aware that Muhammad Faisal often controls and writes content for them, especially when they hold positions within the Steemit team? This raises questions about fairness, transparency, and accountability.
Should individuals with positions exploit their power for personal gain or promote the platform's growth? Is it acceptable for users to create multiple accounts without disclosing them to the Steemit team?
I'm not accusing without evidence; I'm seeking clarification. If the Steemit team doesn't provide satisfactory answers, it may indicate a lack of transparency. Let's focus on discussing how users can address issues with multiple accounts and reward hunting. I'm steemit lover
Love to All
Do you know relation ship of them , answer yes no respected team or any other @steemcurator01 @steemcurator02
What makes you think it's the same person? When I started my journey on Steemit, my husband did it too. We had the same ip-address because we lived in the same house and I helped him with the withdrawal of steems to the exchange. But that doesn't mean we were the same person. What are your arguments? Now, because of the war, my sister lives in my house. If she wants to have an account on Steemit and I will help her, will you also say that we are the same person?
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
I understand the concerns and for sure there are many farming accounts but as you might have noticed, the opposite of what you had in mind happened.
What I noticed is that A rewards B and what I like to know is if this always happens. If it comes to it we have good writers and I like to ask you if it is fair not to reward them because it looks unfair?
We had the SEC and what happened was for sure not rewarding those who engaged and wrote something fun/good or valuable due to the rules set.
If it comes to internet connections, I share as well, have more than one, and travel. In case of need I use a device which isn't mine but a family's I know this is the same with others, since by far not everyone has a computer with 3 screens, a laptop and a phone.
My suggestion
It would be helpful to show proof since those you mentioned will not respond and this drags on and on and on, which makes me wonder if it's helpful. Like you mentioned, "the team" is very busy and this is extra workload extra work.
How about writing a post + proof + links or what is available, since this thread will not be read. 🤷
You are welcome to post in ᔕᑕᗷ ᗰOᑎKEY ᗷᑌᔕIᑎEᔕᔕ - @hive-152479
Please, use a picture with 1 topic. See for example what is posted.
Thank you.
You shared a lot of info and I am sure that those you mention are adult enough to respond and don't need someone else to do that for them.
I noticed @stmpak.wit knows @afzalqamar very well.
https://steemit.com/steemreps2025/@stmpak.wit/swgxlu
For sure the team is very busy and it's hard to tell who is honest and who isn't.
But hey, I am looking forward to hear the responses of the ones you mentioned and see the proof. Well, if it comes to the Booming votes I already saw who voted whom with in a few minutes after posting but coincidence seems to exist.
I like freedom of speech but also proof of evidence.
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.19 SP