Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    I never said it wasn't, but it certainly isn't $200,000+ /week valuable (and far more once the weekly average kick in, that was 7-day average but only 2 days of real votes), the real number is going to be in the hundreds of thousands.

    If you think one person should be getting that many rewards by spamming 10+ posts a day and getting $250 upvotes, I'm ok with losing that vote.

    He's already up to 56K+/week and will be around 300K/week once he has received 7 days worth of votes.

    You may be ok with that, but 99.9% of Steem isn't likely.

    [-]
     7 years ago 

    I am no expert on how Steemit works but this seems to be more of a problem of @rancherorelaxo abusing their power/vote rather than a problem with Haejin. I have no idea who that account represents but there is a community of users who have come to Steemit solely to read Haejin's material.

    This also highlights the problem that we have in society at large where more money leads to more influence. If Steemit wants to be a more egalitarian place then perhaps there should be a change made where voting power peaks after some amount of SP and then only increases at a much reduced rate. How many of those people in Power would willingly vote to give up some of their power to create a fairer system?

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.00, 0.00 TRX
    4 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     7 years ago 

    First off, I didn't flag him. I only presented data I dug up.
    Second, flagging is a tool like upvotes, the community decides the value of a payout. If something is too high, people can flag it (really downvote) if it is too low, people can upvote it. That's how Steemit was designed.

    One person getting 300,000 USD/week from one person for posting charts seems a bit out of whack. I have no idea how good or bad his material is, but posting 10+ times a day for $250+ is not something Steemit community is favorable to.

    I also have the question if it is the same person doing the voting. I find it difficult to believe someone with 3M USD stake decides to reward on and only one person all his rewards.

    Again, I just presented the information and my opinion, all your buddies decided to downvote me and threaten my life and threaten to dox me. Sounds like real winners.

    $0.13
    • Past Payouts $0.13, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.10, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.03, 0.00 TRX
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     7 years ago 

    I appreciate you putting the data out there. I have no affiliation with anyone who makes threatening comments. Violence is not my way.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago 

      So if i understand right, this "whale" give 300K a week to him for posting charts? If its the money of this whale, where exactly is the problem? I not get it...

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         7 years ago 

        We all share a reward pool, and one person getting 8%+ of it isn't healthy. Especially for low effort content being boosted by one person. If I started to use my 2M SP to just pump my content to $450 posts 10+ times a day, people would be pissed.

        [-]
         7 years ago 

        Kilama gesao hinsa dasa.