Can you explain why you claimed: "They only pay out on severe injuries and Asperger's and Dysgraphia are not on the severe list for compensation" in the linked thread, despite it not being true?

https://steemit.com/vaccines/@tecnosgirl/re-i-repost-re-tecnosgirl-re-i-repost-re-tecnosgirl-re-canadian-coconut-their-children-s-names-will-never-be-on-the-vaxxed-bus-healthy-and-unvaccinated-20170711t234600432z

According to http://myvaccinelawyer.com/vaccine-claims/the-vaccine-claim-process/, you only need to prove "that 1) the injured person received a vaccine listed on the Vaccine Injury Table and 2) that the vaccine caused the injury."

They also point this out again at the bottom of this page http://myvaccinelawyer.com/vaccine-claims/the-vaccine-injury-table/

This is also corroborated by this article: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp078168

Note the lines

To win a VICP award, the claimant does not need to prove everything that is required to hold a vaccine maker liable in a product liability lawsuit. But a causal connection must be shown. If medical records show that a child had one of several listed adverse effects within a short period after vaccination, the VICP presumes that it was caused by the vaccine (although the government can seek to prove otherwise).

and

If families claim that a vaccine caused an adverse effect that is not on the list, the burden of proof rests with them

The only difference is that you have to actually "prove" (not scientifically mind you. many times health officials will disagree with the court's decision to pay out.) something if the claim isn't on the list.