RE: [Steemjet Weekly Report #1] - Delegatee stats
Again to reiterate this data is for APRIL 27 2018 to MAY 5 2018. Which is almost TWO WEEKS AGO.
I am aware of steemd but it is hard to MANUALLY checked there, but since you want me to double check essiential, then here goes:
Essiential voted this posts:
essiential upvote @essiential/you-need-steempayout-com-for-an-easier… (58%) 7days ago 7 days ago
essiential upvote @dimimp/wow-if-you-thought-that-upvoting-helped-yo… (86%) 7 days ago
essiential upvote @shartzy/chanel-your-opportunities-towards-achievi… (22%) 8 days ago
essiential upvote @owaniofficial/happie-the-bird-entry-contest (38%) 8 days ago
essiential upvote @owaniofficial/steem-high-design-contest (59%) 8days ago
essiential upvote @sunscape/animalsunday-photography-by-sunscape 12days ago
A total of 6 posts. That's why I've said that the discrepancy lies on the time the snapshot was taken because if the snapshot was taken at the morning then the first one will not be taken in the data making it 5.
It is also worthy to note that only top-level posts are being included on the first column. Upvotes to replies are not so you might see less.
That aside, I'm not sure the number of posts on the steemjet tag is up to 160 during the week. Yet, you stated that a member made 140 votes? I'm sorry, I'm not agreeing to steemocean.
For that table, comments upvoted under the "steemjet" tag is included. Since ENTRIES and SUBMISSIONS are mostly in the form of comments, I think we should also include those, right?
Either way I respect your sentiment and doubt regarding the data being presented above. But whatever presented is coming from a third-party. But if you know of any EASY tool for doing these things, then feel free to tell me.
Well, It's nice you are doing this. I just took note of the date. I was backdating to 7 days ago initially.
For the steemjet aspects, you can edit and write "posts and comments involving steemjet" cos I was surprised a user has 140 vote given the fact that posts isn't even up to that.
I will like to know how you got the steemjet statistics though.
And I learnt steemreports.com also gives analysis. Atimes you can just compare with other tools to conclude.
You know everybody won't agree to this, and they will come with their proves too.
Good job. I know you put in lots of work to get this.
Hey thanks! And yeah, it's easy to miss the date on this one. :)
Also the reason why I chose to use
steemoceaninstead of any other tools is that almost all the data I need is on their plus anyone could just look it up there everytime they have doubts about the numbers. I initially thought of using steemsql which most analysts here use but I know people will have doubts about where the numbers are coming from. It's nice to be transparent about everything. So that's why I chose steemocean.The numbers are also their, along with all the tags/categories you have voted for that week
This is really funny to read, because steemocean heavily rely on SteemSQL to get its data.
All the data in SteemSQL are directly from the blockchain and SteemSQL is an exact replica of the blockchain.
You can compare data from the database with data from any steemd node.
You have to trust the aggregation process of a data source like steemocean, or any source that provide already aggregated data. And unfortunately, you cannot verify this process. So, your transparency argument is not as strong as you think ;)
Oh sorry I didn't mean it like that! :)
First of all I trust SteemSQL and I honestly thought that steemocean uses data from SteemSQL, that's why I was thinking of directly using SteemSQL for this.
But, what I meant about the "transparent" thing is that a way for people who have doubts to clearly show the numbers being taken too. I could show them an excel file or a screenshot but people will still have doubts about the numbers. That's why I opted to use steemocean instead as I could just send them the steemocean link I got the numbers too. :)
Alright! Another thing you should put into consideration is worth of upvote.
Upoting 30 posts at 5% each isn't far fetched. A member upvoting fewer members with a higher voting power, what do we say about that?
Sometimes it's not about the number of upvotes you made but the impact of the upvotes.
Once again, good job.
I did take that into consideration. That is why I added TV_O = Total Value of upvotes to other people in SBD as I see some people upvoting only at 5-10% to other people but 100% on their own comments. XD
and TV_SJ = Total Value of upvotes to "steemjet" category (although this one might include self-votes too, so I still need to something for this)
Also for my analysis I take in two important things:
First, # of upvotes made and Second, total value of given votes.
And a little minor on self-voting and self-voting upvote worth in SBD.
Either way, thanks for all this. There is indeed a lot to take into consideration. :)
Your devotion is quite noteworthy. I have been partially incapacitated shortly as I'm having issues with my device. I hope to get back on track by next week fully.. Well done!
Issokay