You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [Steemjet Weekly Report #1] - Delegatee stats
Well, It's nice you are doing this. I just took note of the date. I was backdating to 7 days ago initially.
For the steemjet aspects, you can edit and write "posts and comments involving steemjet" cos I was surprised a user has 140 vote given the fact that posts isn't even up to that.
I will like to know how you got the steemjet statistics though.
And I learnt steemreports.com also gives analysis. Atimes you can just compare with other tools to conclude.
You know everybody won't agree to this, and they will come with their proves too.
Good job. I know you put in lots of work to get this.
Hey thanks! And yeah, it's easy to miss the date on this one. :)
Also the reason why I chose to use
steemoceaninstead of any other tools is that almost all the data I need is on their plus anyone could just look it up there everytime they have doubts about the numbers. I initially thought of using steemsql which most analysts here use but I know people will have doubts about where the numbers are coming from. It's nice to be transparent about everything. So that's why I chose steemocean.The numbers are also their, along with all the tags/categories you have voted for that week
This is really funny to read, because steemocean heavily rely on SteemSQL to get its data.
All the data in SteemSQL are directly from the blockchain and SteemSQL is an exact replica of the blockchain.
You can compare data from the database with data from any steemd node.
You have to trust the aggregation process of a data source like steemocean, or any source that provide already aggregated data. And unfortunately, you cannot verify this process. So, your transparency argument is not as strong as you think ;)
Oh sorry I didn't mean it like that! :)
First of all I trust SteemSQL and I honestly thought that steemocean uses data from SteemSQL, that's why I was thinking of directly using SteemSQL for this.
But, what I meant about the "transparent" thing is that a way for people who have doubts to clearly show the numbers being taken too. I could show them an excel file or a screenshot but people will still have doubts about the numbers. That's why I opted to use steemocean instead as I could just send them the steemocean link I got the numbers too. :)
Alright! Another thing you should put into consideration is worth of upvote.
Upoting 30 posts at 5% each isn't far fetched. A member upvoting fewer members with a higher voting power, what do we say about that?
Sometimes it's not about the number of upvotes you made but the impact of the upvotes.
Once again, good job.
I did take that into consideration. That is why I added TV_O = Total Value of upvotes to other people in SBD as I see some people upvoting only at 5-10% to other people but 100% on their own comments. XD
and TV_SJ = Total Value of upvotes to "steemjet" category (although this one might include self-votes too, so I still need to something for this)
Also for my analysis I take in two important things:
First, # of upvotes made and Second, total value of given votes.
And a little minor on self-voting and self-voting upvote worth in SBD.
Either way, thanks for all this. There is indeed a lot to take into consideration. :)