You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My Self-Experiment: Arbitrary Power Used By Arbitrary People
exactly 😅 And I actually like that it is so successful. I just have a problem with how my case was handled.
exactly 😅 And I actually like that it is so successful. I just have a problem with how my case was handled.
It was handled how it should have been, you spammed so you got flagged. Where is the problem?
that this was an experiment (which I admit that I should have researched about this before) to see if this kind of behavior is possible on steemit.
The problem that I have is that no one seems to acknowledge this and that I am being categorized as a "spammer" when it is oviously clear by looking through my posts that this is not so. More so, when this has been the first time that I have done this.
I'd like to believe that I am contributing to steemit. See for example:
https://steemit.com/blog/@tobetada/do-followers-really-mean-anything
Thought that was a thoughtful article. Too bad people seem to need to buy votes to get visibility on stuff like that. 🥺
I'm stubborn as a mule. I'd rather not be appreciated than have to pay to be appreciated.
Posted using Partiko Android
Yes, I agree! Thanks for giving it a read @anthonyadavisii !
👆 this guy is part of the cabal !
it is all about stealing STEEM from users
Cabal? One of my favorite MK characters but spelled with a 'K'.
Used to spam the hell out of the web spin and fireballs.
As for stealing Steem, why do you insist with this idea that payout is yours before 7 days? It's not how it works. It is not stealing.
You used to copy/paste video links for rewards. That is indefensible. Just drop it already.
Posted using Partiko Android
Someone should really let @themarkymark know that copy/paste for rewards is indefensible...
https://steemit.com/meme/@themarkymark/next-colony-meme-contest-win-10-steem
it is not stealing only inside your head , in reality this is no different than walking into starbucks and stealing tip jar .
If I leave $0.01 tip to someone that means I want that person to get $0.01 and you have no right to take it away .
The analogy doesn't work. It's more like a reallocating from a finite pool that is intended to reward constructive behaviors.
So, a better example would be a guy taking a dump on the sidewalk, their accomplice (could be their inside guy ie unscrupulous bid bot) allocating payment from that finite fund for that activity. Then another person with authority over the fund allocation sees that and chooses to reverses the misallocation... Because obviously we don't want to be incentivizing people taking a dump in the street.
If everyone was willing to put in actual work for their contributions, we wouldn't have a problem.
Posted using Partiko Android
isn't that interesting , @themarkymark is the biggest promoter of downvoting and in the same time he runs one of the biggest "unscrupulous bid bot" . In the same time we know that downvoting increases the vote value of his bid-bot . Hm
It sound more like you and marky are taking dump on the sidewalk and trying to convince people that you are planting flowers
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
I flag trash. You have received a flag.