You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemit Update [January 13th, 2025] : Steemit Learning Challenge Season 22 - Week 5

in #steemit4 days ago

Hello, there is an issue with timing and delays in sharing works. For example, if a work is shared just a day after the challenge is announced, it may reach the 7-day time limit, after which the post expires and may not be rewarded by the curator accounts. I encountered this issue last season.

In addition, I hope that the criteria for rewarding early participants will be carefully considered, as some challenges, especially programming-related challenges, allow users to simply wait until the end and copy responses from other users.

As for AI, I think that AI detection is sometimes inaccurate. In the past 3 months, I participated in a challenge where others claimed that my post was generated by AI, even though the blog with many images was all taken with my iPhone. The AI ​​detection system even indicated that the name of the image was related to AI. In my opinion, the solution is to make the challenges more difficult and require a minimum of three images from users, as well as additional resources, from what I have seen, there are challenges where all participants receive scores between 9 and 10 for the tasks, for example, in cooking challenges, people take pictures of themselves cooking, which can be a guarantee that the image is not from AI since they take the pictures at home

I also think that some teachers may use AI tools while others do not, which leads to confusion in the feedback. The feedback I received did not make sense based on my participation. I also suspect that some people get high marks simply because they are friends with others, which does not seem fair.

In addition, some teachers do not clarify their questions well. For example, some questions only ask for code to achieve a certain behavior, but in the feedback, I was told that I did not explain the code I wrote in detail. However, the teacher did not ask for this level of detail in the original question.

Sort:  

The same thing that happened to you is happening to me, I am making the post of the challenges the first days after the challenge was published, I was chosen in the podium and I am among the first 4, but in the end my post is already 7 days old and I will not be rewarded, I imagine that this has happened to many, the solution that I think I will apply is to publish the post a little late.

It's a good solution, but I think it's important to consider who published first. This would be a valuable criterion. However, the rules of the Learning Challenge should be improved. Sometimes, the current system feels unfair

see , I'm disappointed because the entry is closed, and the teacher still hasn't given me her feedback. I don't know why. Here is the link to the entry: https://steemit.com/hive-167213/@kafio/slc-or-s22w4-developing-teachers-knowledge-and-skills."

What I can tell you my friend is that I am very disillusioned and unmotivated, I have made the decision for the moment not to post in the algebra challenges until I wait to see if they get their act together and change the way they are going.

Yes, me too, and it's always the same people who gain.