What makes you say that? The porn industry is insanely lucrative for the big tube websites, so why not make a blockchain version of it that makes it easier for people to monetize their own productions? I get why some people are skeptical, but I don't think it is fair to call anything a scam just based on the fact that you don't like the idea.
Ok,ok i might have exagerated a bit. But porn blockchain? i don't know how the community will welcome this. I know, there are allot of money in the porn business, but for me, it seems a little weird. From what i've seen on Steemit, porn and nsfw posts doesn't have great success, but i suspect it's more about the moral side of things they are not that popular. But , i watch porn, who doesn't! it just feels weird to get payed watching porn
I guess each have to decide for themselves if they want to buy tokens that are used for operating and paying production of porn, and I can totally understand why some people would not really do this. However, porn does not have to be a bad thing, and there are reputable companies in that sector as well.
Well, this "scam" is backed by Penthouse Media, one of, if not, the larget adult media company in the US. So I wouldn't be so quick jumping to conclusions. Do some research first :)
I can understand your reaction :) To answer your question: I would say yes, but my username would definitley not be my real name. I might have to go back to using the TOR browser with a proxy, hahaha!
Well that seems like it would be a pain, if you're into privacy, like me. If this idea will go places, interactions should be anonymous, or at least you should have the option to switch
With a blockchain, everything will be saved permanently, so you better be careful with not letting anyone know your account name ;) This is also one of my concerns about using a blockchain to award users to view or upload porn, but I bet this is something that the developers are aware of. (I have not read the whitepaper, so this concern might of course be useless if they have addressed it).
What makes you say that? The porn industry is insanely lucrative for the big tube websites, so why not make a blockchain version of it that makes it easier for people to monetize their own productions? I get why some people are skeptical, but I don't think it is fair to call anything a scam just based on the fact that you don't like the idea.
Ok,ok i might have exagerated a bit. But porn blockchain? i don't know how the community will welcome this. I know, there are allot of money in the porn business, but for me, it seems a little weird. From what i've seen on Steemit, porn and nsfw posts doesn't have great success, but i suspect it's more about the moral side of things they are not that popular. But , i watch porn, who doesn't!
it just feels weird to get payed watching pornI guess each have to decide for themselves if they want to buy tokens that are used for operating and paying production of porn, and I can totally understand why some people would not really do this. However, porn does not have to be a bad thing, and there are reputable companies in that sector as well.
Well, this "scam" is backed by Penthouse Media, one of, if not, the larget adult media company in the US. So I wouldn't be so quick jumping to conclusions. Do some research first :)
I apologize, my brain just reacted to the idea, didn't read the whitepaper. But let me ask you a question:
I can understand your reaction :) To answer your question: I would say yes, but my username would definitley not be my real name. I might have to go back to using the TOR browser with a proxy, hahaha!
Well that seems like it would be a pain, if you're into privacy, like me. If this idea will go places, interactions should be anonymous, or at least you should have the option to switch
With a blockchain, everything will be saved permanently, so you better be careful with not letting anyone know your account name ;) This is also one of my concerns about using a blockchain to award users to view or upload porn, but I bet this is something that the developers are aware of. (I have not read the whitepaper, so this concern might of course be useless if they have addressed it).