You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Social Justice Warrior Life
Invizible or replaced by a clearly vizible text with a hyperlinked part begging to be clicked to reveal whatever it is that hides, or simply "BUTTON!" muh Censorship.
The dude is downright claiming that Parody means what he did:
He didn't parody anything man, he copied it word for word and reproduced the subject DIRECTLY. And it's true, that is liberating, you don't have to agree with what everyone says to be glad that they say it. You do agree more or less that he didn't plagarize or intended to, because he was too dumb to realize that he was even doing that.
Such an experimental thing, half the thread is hilarious, the other half is anger and the last half is trying not to laugh at it all while responding.
Skeptic mimicked the Sears guy, but he did not reproduce Sears work word for word; therefore his work is a parody of Sears work, but a reference to Sears would be preferable and Skeptic has remedied his omission.
FYI, if you understand the definition that you pasted then you should understand that Sears work is satire: he created humour about a sjw without reproducing the sjw directly!
Maybe, instead of being so aggressive, you could have just pointed out, politely, to skeptic that he should reference Sears.
You guys have history, but really, to the casual observer, the way you have conducted yourself in these comments simply smacks of desperation: that you are desperate for him to look bad so that you can look/feel good.
Seriously, can you not see the irony?
SO when he used the exact same jokes, same punchlines, word for word he didn't directly reproduce it. Sears is Parody of SJW, skeptic took that parody and claimed it as his own, not Satire.
Sears was mocking and making fun of SJW by mimicking what they do. What did skeptic make fun of? Sears? Was he Parodying Sears, who was Parodying a SJW? Should really read what Satire is and what Parody is don't you think:
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/literature/whats-the-difference-between-parody-and-satire
At this point I have to agree with skeptic that your comprehension skills are somewhat lacking. You read a definition and your understanding of it is completely wrong even when given a clear example. Stew in your ignorance or have someone sit down with you and explain it- I give up.
YOu have to agree that what Skeptic did was Parody.
That this is Skeptic's Parody? What examples were given? That he changed Web To Steemit and used every joke in the video as it was said? I'm stewing in ignorance after I've addressed your reply that "duh this is parody" which missed the point that it wasn't skeptic's parody, he didn't mock SJW, JP did. Skeptic didn't make any comedy, you clearly know what "satire" and "parody" are, thats why you took the time to answer to my question/reply to my post instead of Rage Quitting over my completely wrong understanding, here's my post again, for reference to everyone who might be nodding their heads at you and his antics.
I should lighten up after you called me a loser and a loner, lmao, project much, I cannot possibly enjoy laughing this much at people not even understanding what copy pasting is and mimicking and mocking is.
He didn't reproduce Joke after Joke word for word, no? LMAO! Nor did he reproduce the subject that sears was Parodying, Satire is what he was doing lmao, he was doing Animal Farm not Scary Movie 3.
No, he didn't reproduce it word for word. Listen to the video and read skeptic's work and you will find that he cut it down considerably and made it more suitable for steemit.
You keep laughing because you need to lighten up.
Expect no more replies from me and feel free to have the last word.
He changed a couple scenery things, and called his parody. All the jokes are JP's not his. Do you understand that JP was making the jokes about SJW, which is PARODY, because he mocks and doesn't care about a deep message, such as a satirical piece. What Skeptic did was take another parody and copy pasted it over here/formated it for this setting, but the subject was always SJW, he wasn't parodying SJW, JP was, he "made it more suitable for steemit". The point is that NOBODY was confused about this being a parody because it's a parody, the point is that if you do indeed listen to the video it's word for word line for line (except he put Steemit instead of Web, and changes some figures around.. lmao and calls it HIS) and you would understand why others have remarked that "it's not parody" and it's very easy to consider what he did plagiarizing.
Thank you for "discussing" instead of furiously leaving me with the last word, because why actually try to understand what is happening outside your assumptive narrative.
BTW I saw Skeptic's parodies before, what this is though is not HIS parody, seems that is quite lost on you and why should I give you the benefit of doubt over satire even, to you mimiking something to make a joke about it and copy pasting jokes that you changed some names around and some scenery are the same thing, no?
you keep posting the the quote but yout dont seem to understand it still.
lol
what the hell else would you call the post? i was mimicing the concept and ideas jp sears was making in his original content. that is the definition of parody by your own definition. smfh
and that was what the original creator of what i parodied was doing.
same with your censorship logic, you do not seem to understand the definition of censorship or just words in general or your willing to ignore them to push your narritive.
censorship is
it does not matter if it is still there if it has been suppresed it is still censorship.
but please do continue telling us how the definitions of words are what they are.
LMFAO!
Umm it's suppressed even though its Still there. Got it.
LMAFO!
Your understanding of words is amazing pleas do tell us more.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
It's not Threathening people to remove their flags, it's defending myself
Or in this case
A parody of a parody
#TIMOM #Paroty