You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Small fish in the Steem sea

in #steem12 days ago

I wouldn’t say auto upvoting is inherently bad - if someone needs a little artificial boost to get started, that’s their choice.

Oh, I mean all auto-voting. Not just the use of bidbots but curation trails and everything else. I've seen some extremely interesting authors who were so good when they signed up. Then they became moderator of a community and with that, some auto-votes from a curation trail. It went from extremely interesting to 3 or 4 photos of their food every day. Whilst this user wasn't buying votes, she'd sold her soul.


When we were in a curation team (steemcurator0x), I created @curator-helper which would scan for active posts with particular tags, sorted by my algorithm and that hadn't already been voted for by one of the steemcurator accounts. I don't run it very often but it's a good way to find new content that I might be interested in. I've just run it so take a look and see if there's anything you like 🙂


I have nothing against them, I know a few who are nice and sensible. I just wish they would engage a little rather than just upvote.

They do every now and again and it's so nice. But then it's as though somebody in Beijing saw what they were doing and makes them stop! And then just like that, they're gone again.

Sort:  

It went from extremely interesting to 3 or 4 photos of their food every day. Whilst this user wasn't buying votes, she'd sold her soul.

That's really unfortunate...

I've just run it so take a look and see if there's anything you like 🙂

I would - as long as there are no cricket-related posts 😄Joking, it seemed like a good filter and it listed a user I’m already keeping an eye on 👍

somebody in Beijing saw what they were doing and makes them stop!

Oh, now I understand. Hm...

Oh, good thinking with the #cricket tag - I don’t think I’ve added that one yet 😉

I make sure that I block a lot of accounts across everything that I do! I think the my interface blocks about 60% of content now. Which still isn’t enough 😆

60%! Damn, this place is so messed up 🤣

the #cricket tag - I don’t think I’ve added that one yet 😉

🤦‍♂️

I’ll have to run my code and find out. I filter out bot users, krsuccess, people I’ve blacklisted and some entire communities. I should probably filter out #thediarygame too.

I want to filter out my feed too, it's always flooded with resteemed posts (5-10) from a single user. It's really annoying😐

I should probably filter out #thediarygame too.

Good thinking 😉

I want to filter out my feed too, it's always flooded with resteemed posts (5-10) from a single user. It's really annoying😐

Well, if you're looking at it through your Friends Feed (https://steemit.com/@henryclive/feed), I introduced the [Hide Resteems[(https://steemit.com/hive-151113/@the-gorilla/proposal-86-change-log-hide-resteems) functionality a few months ago which solves that problem 🙂

Oh, great work! I did notice the hide resteem function but I hadn't used that yet since I don't want to hide resteemed posts from a particular user who actually resteems quality content.

Although I could unfollow the user who resteems 5–10 posts a day, I don't want to - because I like her own posts. So my solution has been to rarely check my feed and go directly to the community or user's page...

I don't want to hide resteemed posts from a particular user who actually resteems quality content.

I tend to start with ReSteems hidden and then if I want to see more, I'll unhide them and see what crops up.

Although I could unfollow the user who resteems 5–10 posts a day, I don't want to - because I like her own posts

If the people that she's resteeming are consistently bad, you could mute them. That doesn't feel like a great solution though.