You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Moving to hive
basically what bernie is doing is stopping the drain from an exploiter so that those many many people who work hard on here and do actual quality posts get a fair share of the reward pool.
I have come to Steem to follow Haejin. I have no intention to become a blogger so felt this platform is not for me. But after being here for a while I started considering buying steem as well just that my interactions have more of an effect. If you guys want to form a private boys club and hope that it will also to become a functional and lucrative Blog, well good luck with it. New comers will come, see whats up with this place and if they like it they stay and become a functional member of the community. What you fail to understand is People like Haejin are drawing enormous number of new people here! Thanks to that and his hard work, he is benefiting the greatest, but you guys will benefit from that in the short to mid term as well. But as long as the atmosphere you create here is toxic (claiming all newcomers are bots, name calling etc.) and trying to lynch someone who happened to get a bigger share of the cake... The cake will be small and dry as it is now.
the bottom line is if @haejin or anyone else is okay with the huge upvote by one whale, then he needs to be just as okay with counter votes bringing the payout down. That is the way the system balances itself out.
those multiple posts per day getting huge upvotes each was bound to draw attention. That is also how the system works to maintain balance.
There are several ways the downvotes could end. They depend on behaviour being modified to contribute to balance in the community.
You may be right, you may not be cut out for this platform.
The funny thing is that you all were using this whales money for a half a year and nobody chuckled. And now, when this person finally gave his vote to the content creator that is valuable for him, all the parasites are screaming that it is not fair.
We were using his money? You think STEEM is a bank?
STEEM is created through content creation. He made an investment just like buying any other other crypto. When the value of STEEM rises, do does the investment. Likewise when it falls, down it goes.
He used his investment to upvote someone he presumably liked and bernie and others used their investment to counter that vote because they disagreed. Each acted as they chose.
Like I said earlier if @haejin is fine with the upvotes, he has to be likewise accepting of the downvotes. Doesn't appear to be bothering him as much as the shills behind him.
If anything he's again stepped up his posting rate. When I look this morning and see him putting up posts 3 minutes apart, it appears he will keep up his behaviour and will have to take the response to it.
I know that your mafia is very strong and you have ton of bots that do the dirty job for you. This if fine with me.
You just can not imagine that there are enough smart people on the other side as well. And if they start to use the same technique against you? With the money they have earned with the knowledge they got from the content they read, I am sure you gonna be down really soon.
But we use all the resources to do no harm. I wish you good luck with your fights. 🙏
my mafia is very strong? and I have a ton of bots?
You're funny... a moron .. but funny.
When you get an actual clue.. let me know.
i'm having my doubts. what if what he is really doing is preventing upvotes by sucking all the steempower here right before christmas, poisoning the water of the new users, making them think steemit sucks.
so i look this morning and he's posted two posts three minutes apart and then another less than an hour later... you really think any thought goes into creating that content?
Looks more and more like someone on a mission to milk all he can.
no different that the vote sellers. both abuses need to be addressed. all that will happen with this downvote brigade is less upvotes from good hearted people that want to do what is right.
this issue needs to be address in another way.
you keep missing the point that those with stake have as much right to downvote as they do to upvote.
I'm not familiar with vote sellers... heard they are around but not something i have contact with.
You are doing an apples and oranges thing here.
He did that because the 3 posts were 3 different cryptos, and it look him a few minutes to chart and analyse each, and then he made them immediately available to his followers so that they could buy before it was too late! What is wrong with that?
He makes it easy for his followers to find what they need by keeping it simple, one post = one analysis.