RE: Was the burning of notre dame an Arson?
as to the ruling our arson and terrorism, newsweek reports the following:
investigators said they were working on the assumption that the fire was started “involuntarily,” ruling out a criminal motive for the blaze or arson.... The extent of the destruction, especially in this hard-to-reach area surrounded by scaffolding, was so great that material evidence showing the cause of the fire will not be easy to come by—and may already have been destroyed.
So they don't have evidence that it was an accident either. The official claim of an accident is assumption, just as the people are left to have other assumptions. The forensic evidence may be destroyed. They are choosing a theory of the perceived least harm even though they, like the rest of us, don't really know what happened. The people want and look for answers. What happened to journalism; it's basically has become like a cult to a divine king (a spectrum of socialist ideals). Instead of protecting us from government, it seeks to sacrifice us to appease their king.
It is perhaps as Glenn beck allegedly argued, if it was Muslim extremists we may never know. Just got done reading a liberal hit piece against him, https://splinternews.com/glenn-beck-is-spouting-insane-dangerous-bullshit-about-1834068103 . At least they admit [imply] it would be a dangerous reality if that were the case. But supposing that dangerous reality were the case, why hide the population from the Danger we are presently in. It doesn't make us safer, it makes us less prepared for the invasion already in progress. How did the city of Rome fall to the German People? Reportedly the Germans gave the Romans 300 of their best youth warriors as obedient slaves, and at night the youths joined together and killed the guards and opened the gates letting the German invaders in where on some accounts then burned and killed everyone [in accounts sparing the christians]. A democracy basically is nothing more than rule by factions with a constitution as a safeguard, a conviction in court can be prevented by just one person...just a small percent of the people can mean a whole group of people can act lawlessly. Kind of like how some governments are refusing to prosecute immigrants who are rapists. Democracies could very well turn to sharia-at least that's better than feminism.
A contributing editor for Time magazine posted yesterday that his jesuit friend said the fire was not accident. It was picked up by infowars, and infowars is being labeled fox news. Such hit piece refuse to show the original tweet. It is convenient to just target infowars, because people already have their impression of that site. https://www.infowars.com/notre-dame-cathedral-in-paris-on-fire-worker-claims-it-was-deliberately-started/
see also.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/16/tech/conspiracy-theories-notre-dame-cathedral-fire/index.html
source:infowars
and his twitter info
source:https://twitter.com/chrisjollyhale