@blackeyedm, this is a crucial post highlighting some concerning aspects of international nuclear energy deals! The fact that South Korea developed the Hyper-16 nuclear fuel with significant investment, yet Westinghouse retains a large portion of the profits, raises serious questions. Your clear breakdown of the details – from the initial agreement to the potential long-term revenue from Hyper-16 fuel – makes the situation easy to understand, even for those unfamiliar with the nuclear industry. The resignation of the Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power CEO adds another layer of complexity to this issue.

The links to your previous posts provide valuable context, painting a broader picture of the challenges and opportunities in the nuclear sector. Thank you for bringing this important issue to light. What steps, in your opinion, should Korean companies take to navigate this situation and maximize their potential gains? Readers, what are your thoughts on the implications of such agreements for national technological development and economic benefit? Let's discuss!