You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 280) in the WOX

in WORLD OF XPILAR5 days ago (edited)

3/ Наконец-то я начинаю понимать эти вечные поиски кураторами качественного контента на Steemit. Желание наградить хороший контент прекрасно.

При этом стоит учесть, что Steemit не сможет купить весь качественный контент, который есть в интернете. Поэтому наверное "качество" должно включать в себя несколько варьирующихся критериев: глубина, новизна, общительность автора, финансовое поведение автора.

Во всем этом мне особенно интересно желание расширить охват пользователей курированием. Многие пользователи Steemit постят хороший контент при регулярных наградах. Но цель не собрать как можно больше контента, а курировать как можно больше пользователей. Это значит немного снизить требования к "качеству" для большего "количества". Проще всего это сделать составив список награждаемых авторов и стараться дополнять этот список.

Интересно проверить, учитывает ли эти критерии рекомендуемая программа обзора.

I'm finally starting to understand these eternal searches for curated high-quality content on Steemit. The desire to reward good content is great.

It is worth considering that Steemit will not be able to buy all the high-quality content that is available on the Internet. Therefore, probably "quality" should include several varying criteria: depth, novelty, sociability of the author, financial behavior of the author.

In all this, I am particularly interested in the desire to expand the reach of users by curation. Many Steemit users post good content with regular rewards. But the goal is not to collect as much content as possible, but to curate as many users as possible. This means slightly reducing the "quality" requirements for a larger "quantity". The easiest way to do this is to make a list of awarded authors and try to supplement this list.

It is interesting to check whether the recommended review program takes these criteria into account.

Посмотрела предложенную программу статистики: количество постов, количество слов в постах, самые активные авторы, принадлежность к клубам. Похоже, в курировании всё гораздо проще, чем мы думаем.

I looked at the proposed statistics program: the number of posts, the number of words in posts, the most active authors, membership in clubs. Curation seems to be much easier than we think.

Sort:  

That's not per se the case. It also means that you can not receive an upvote, no matter how active you are because you are downvoting, Does that make sense? Perhaps to some, the reality is that sooner or later most steemians will for one reason or another.

@ wakeupkitty

6091124672637814472.jpg

Это логично. / It's logical.

 5 days ago 

Greetings, friend @avoicest

Let's say the motive is to support quality content, but as you well know, each person has a special taste for a specific topic. A curator who likes writing may not like painting, so they neglect content related to the art of painting. This happens with all topics and curators; here we must consider that most curator accounts are managed by the same communities and users.

So, the questions would be: Who should we convince? Or how can I be part of the curation team?

Unfortunately, some support programs are being used for exclusive dynamics; in this case, agile users seek to participate in all of them to have a better chance of obtaining these votes, regardless of whether the content quality decreases. This is where curators must be critical and fair, and adjust if necessary to avoid abuse by participants.

In some ways, supporting content is easy; however, it's important to ensure that the content isn't taken from the internet or republished, among other things, to maintain the platform's reputation.

У всех нас есть любимые авторы, которых мы читаем, и читаем с удовольствием (авторы). Я восхищаюсь людьми, которые могут много читать по любимым темам (тегам). Конечно, чем больше кураторов, тем больше получается охват.

Думаю, тематическим кураторам легче определять злоупотребления.

We all have favorite authors that we read and enjoy reading (the authors). I admire people who can read a lot about their favorite topics (tags). Of course, the more curators there are, the greater the reach.

I think it's easier for thematic curators to identify abuses.

 3 days ago 

Curators should show a broader vision, focusing on their tastes or favorite topics, unless it is a condition or rule for the exclusive use of the curator account.