I agree with you that you can't compare three months ...

In particular, I also agree with @blessedlife. But, statistics are there to compare the state of a particular topic over time. And beyond that, besides providing the possibility to draw provisional conclusions, it also provides the possibility to come up with more important things: questions like ‘what are the possible causes?’, ‘what are the possible consequences?’ This is where statistics finds its true usefulness. This kind of thing you will find to be common if you have been involved in crypto trading, for example.

In the case of SLC, I wondered whether the price of STEEM and SBD might have influenced the participation rate in the SLC, so I collected data up to season 20 (participation data and STEEM and SBD prices at the same time period). I have written down the results of my observations here. Statistics lovers would find this interesting, would you?

During all these months, I've rarely seen a course that seems interesting enough to dedicate my little free time to it.

Yes. One of the possible factors to why the so little participations in the last seasons of SLC. I remember there was seasons in years ago when I can participate in no less than 3 classes a week.

You can do home repair, cook, computer repair, crochet, knitting, but you did not participate in any of those classes or clubs. Why? Because of what? Couldn't find times? Because you already know about these things? Why don't just go like what @adeljose suggest to take it as "a clear opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge" ( I have often done just that in the challenge )? And by doing that maybe there are people who could learn one or two things from you. But then I think that maybe participating in the challenge is not really your thing. 😆