You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ganadores: SLC23-W2 | Dietas, hábitos y sustitutos
We do encourage all Teachers to have a robust grading system that ensures there is a good spread of marks, rather than a lot of bunching of marks in the 9s and 10s.
It is sometimes difficult to evaluate, using decimal differences, several users who have done very well, especially if there is a time lag between publications. I think the healthiest thing is for teachers to evaluate from 1 to 9, and leave 1% as an outstanding factor for the end, according to the teachers' criteria.
Teachers have 1% to award at the end, when they have already analyzed all the positions, that is, they already know which ones have those details that favor them more than the others.
I think I know that the Steemit Team wants that. And we can also see some Teachers doing that very well, taking up assessment work as an equally important part of all SLC activities. Maybe the problem for me is that I don't really understand the methods of some other Teachers, hence my question.
I don't understand what is this steemit team's performance on negative votes for my post.
Is this post wrong?
https://steemit.com/water/@munawwir97/konsumsi-air-putih-sangat-baik-untuk-kesehatan
@steemcurator02, is buying posts for now on steemit not allowed because my real account was downvoted because of that?
Link : https://steemit.com/water/@munawwir97/konsumsi-air-putih-sangat-baik-untuk-kesehatan
Link :
https://steemit.com/lonely/@munawwir97/a-lonely-house-at-night
Thank you very much..