No worries... nice to have some analysis by someone in the field that would be able to decipher if the docs are legit or not (even if it is just a redditor). Haven't heard anything contrary at this point.
I'm keep track, so if he does one again, will cover that one as well - hopefully, if the next tier is reached and more docs are released, or he puts anything else out at Sparky.tech :)
Good stuff, I've sifted through some of the documents myself but I didn't decrypt them on my computer with veracrypt. Even though, I use veracrypt regularly, there's still the possibility of one of the containers hosting malware. Thanks for covering the SparkyTech piece because he recommends mounting the file containers as "read only" which is much safer way of going about it.
No worries... nice to have some analysis by someone in the field that would be able to decipher if the docs are legit or not (even if it is just a redditor). Haven't heard anything contrary at this point.
I'm keep track, so if he does one again, will cover that one as well - hopefully, if the next tier is reached and more docs are released, or he puts anything else out at Sparky.tech :)
Good stuff, I've sifted through some of the documents myself but I didn't decrypt them on my computer with veracrypt. Even though, I use veracrypt regularly, there's still the possibility of one of the containers hosting malware. Thanks for covering the SparkyTech piece because he recommends mounting the file containers as "read only" which is much safer way of going about it.