love the analysis!
my approach to nonsense content is to just skip blabla till something interesting pops. but apparently as you reasonable notice, nonsense content in white paper is not good sign, probably its there to throw to the air some shiny buzzwords to make it feel sexy an expert and fill the space
from now i will use 'nonsense test' in my ico valuation

random thought: you should run web cite for ico valuations and make money with ads. actually just negative ones is great, no one could say you are biased.

second thought: better not.. they will eventually corrupt you with lures and the cite will start to promote junk icos based on amount of bitcoins paid for promotion...