You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Announcing the Delegation Committee

in #committee5 years ago (edited)

I agree. In fact, I've been WAITING for them to take the leap. Is it going to be perfect? No. Will the priority be to increase the value and usership of steem?

Yep.

Will it primarily be designed to benefit steemit inc?

Yep.

Is that a bad thing?

Nope. Not as long as the people who get the delegation are legitimately bringing in the bacon, making it a stronger place, and working toward making this platform a household name. I couldn't care LESS who gets the delegation, as long as their goal is to positively affect our growth with DAPPS and projects that bless and help others besides just us!

Sort:  

That delegation comes out of your share and my share.
You sure you want to advocate taking from the disfavored to benefit the favored?

Your share? Its not "your" share its not a commons, its not public property, its steemit inc's stake and the reward pool doesnt belong to you or me beyond what your upvote can provide.

Then, if that was enforced, why would anybody play this game?

Stinc already dosn't use the majority of the ninjamine against us.
That we get a share at all is because they let crumbs fall from the table.

It is them that benefits most by feeding the minnows.
Keeping the price low makes acquiring stake cheaper.
The less they take the more users we get.
If ned keeps it all for himself, nobody will want any.
Btc's price is zero, if all the coins are in satoshi's wallet.

If your friends are driving off a cliff do you sit idly by while they take you over with them?