Not to get into the legitimacy of people consenting to no one (Declaration of Independence /Definitive Treaty of Peace) Vs the corporation which was hired to provide services to the public (The Constitution) but how or why would someone in the shoes of Purdue go to "private dispute resolution" and concerning that, why would you trust a private company to resolve disputes when they could just as easily if not even more go with the higher bidder or with whomever doesn't have the sheer weight of wealth to demolish them, free market style just like the first monopoly, by willpower and wealth?

Posted using Partiko Android