FICTION, NONFICTION...AND THE TRUTH

"You gotta pay your dues."

— the dues collector

"The world is like a ride at an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it’s real because that’s how powerful our minds are. […] Some people have been on the ride for a long time, and they begin to question, 'Is this real, or is this just a ride?' And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, and they say, 'Hey, don’t worry. Don’t be afraid ever, because this is just a ride.'

And we...kill those people. 'Shut him up. We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account, and my family. This has to be real.'

It’s just a ride. […] It’s just a ride."

― Bill Hicks *

• Bill Hicks:

Who ― in their rational mind ― would care to live on a desert island, with no known method of escape?

Yet, doesn’t all of humanity reside on a desert island, with no suitable plan of circumvention, should they be forced to evacuate the celestial body they call home?

Isn’t it plausible Earth is a sizable spacecraft traversing the Universe? This being accurate, wouldn’t each human upon this vessel be an astronaut? ** If such is so, doesn’t it benefit us to maintain the ship upon which we’re traveling? Doesn’t deliberately damaging this craft ensure our demise?

** Fuller, Buckminster R. (1969). Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN: 0671780468

Then what’s with all the atomic and nuclear testing? How about the pernicious burning of fossil fuels? What used car salesman sold us on continuously leaking nuclear power plants, when we’ve the biggest fusion reactor in this Solar System residing in our celestial backyard? *** And what of the hundreds of thousands of tons of radioactive garbage created by these facilities, for which we have no feasible method of storage? ****

*** Smith, Gar. (2012). Nuclear Roulette: The Truth About the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603584340

**** Into Eternity:

Moreover, if Homo sapiens are astronauts on this vessel, doesn’t destruction of each other mean termination of us all? It’s analogous to Spock continuously conspiring to kill Kirk. If such were so, the USS Enterprise would crash before its crew could complete season one.

As humans, we see ourselves as the consummate of intellect. In actuality, we can’t know much, since this Universe is vast, and we’re solely one species of insect on a microscopic dot in the cosmic spectrum.

Earth is a speck of dust in a colossal celestial ocean. Upon that particle is an even more minuscule morsel known as humanity. *****

***** Pale Blue Dot:

It’s essential to our survival we learn as much about our environment as possible. Yet, doctrines like the Bible, the Koran and the Torah assure us there’s nothing we need research outside them, since they’re dogmas of some omniscient deity, and thus explain everything there is to know. If all humankind were to have lived by the letter of these publications, we would’ve invented nothing, and still be marveling at fire.

Even though the above books assert to possessing answers to every question asked, why can’t we reference them for the solution to anti-gravity, interstellar travel or zero-point energy?

Unraveled ― as its title proposes ― disentangles what most humans believe is reality. It’s a difficult truth to learn you’ve been living a series of lies, when you’re 103. Examine the words within. You’ll question what you once believed was real.

When you view the human plight from an impartial eye, the insanity of what most of us are doing is all too apparent.

Apart from the author, nobody’s gonna read this blog. This is too bad, as the erudition that follows is thicker than a five pound pork chop.

Then again, most individuals ― probably you included ― don’t live in reality.

Sources:

Books:

Fuller, Buckminster R. (1969). Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN: 0671780468

Smith, Gar. (2012). Nuclear Roulette: The Truth About the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603584340

Movies:

Into Eternity. Dir. Michael Madsen. Perfs. Timo Aikas, Carl Reinhold Brakenhjelm. DVD, 2010

Online Movies:

Into Eternity:

ENLIGHTENMENT

"A lot of Christians wear crosses around their necks. You think when Jesus comes back he ever wants to see a fuckin’ cross?"

― Bill Hicks *

• Bill Hicks:

“My husband cums in the first five minutes.”

I needed to hear this about as much as Kojak needed hair ties.

“I’ve been married 18 years, and have never had an orgasm during intercourse.”

Like 1400-DPI, color photos of one’s colon, it was more info than I’d asked for. Even so, the naked woman beneath me clearly wanted to come clean ― so to speak.

It was at that point I realized how imprisoned humans had become; how insane their mores were. A mandate created by some nameless control freak, at an undisclosed point in history, meant the undulant housewife currently in my presence couldn’t leave her lover in order to shoot a decent load of girl cum?! **

** Hubby, in this scenario, had coordinated his wife's erotic encounter with me. I may be horny, but I'm not duplicitous.

Inserting myself, I pumped away. We reached the six minute mark, as old boundaries were obliterated.

Let’s get something straight. I’m as appealing in bed as a Dutch oven. If it took a loser like me to make this woman orgasm, there was something seriously wrong regarding the paradigm in which we resided.

As years passed, I’d realize it was more than just one portion of the human endeavor that was out of whack. The entire system, to its core, was fucked. At this early stage, however, amid the glow of methane from a cow pasture adjacent this Motel Sex, it was apparent how irrational an institution like marriage was. Because someone wants to amass money from you ― should you choose to divorce ― you’re obligated by a silly directive to remain unhappy and unsatisfied?

Pondering this slavery to an inscrutable master, I continued to pump away, and ostensibly faked orgasms one and two commenced.

At this point, I’d been with maybe a thousand women, and most of them declared the same thing: They felt trapped by the system.

What was this enigmatic order to which they alluded?

Who knew, but they’d been scared to contradict it. Hence hesitant to shatter the shackles of marriage, frightened of religious wrath, or fearful of satiating their inherent desires, and being deemed a slut. They’d bought into this scheme that was developed to engender anxiety, and thereby obtain control.

Feigned orgasms three, four and five.

I was glad I’d seen the fallacy of this system early, and refused to adhere to it. If I hadn’t, I may have been married by now ― beaten into submission by a wife and children I abhorred.

As I reached for lube, my ephemeral lover’s orgasms were now occurring every 60 seconds. I thanked myself for not falling prey to the lunacy so many around me had.

Bob Blake ― as Baretta ― shot some dude on the six channel Sony in fantastic Technicolor.

The plump blonde joined at my hip stopped for a minute, catching her breath and gulping the 32 ounce Screwdriver I’d mixed her ― with a splash of orange juice for coloring.

Grainy shades of moonlight pierced her ample ass through curtains some obviously massive insect had been feasting on for years.

Although the encounter was as common for me as breakfast beer, this particular incident was a catalyst. The words I’d heard so often before ― from so many women ― placed me on a path for truth. If the marriage thing was a scam, what other lies were we being forced to deep throat?

Draggin’ my TV out to the desert, I mercifully filled its workings with low-caliber bullets, and began to question everything. I embarked on a reading frenzy, and haven’t stopped since. Comic books, warning labels, cryptic scratchings on matchbooks at interstate truck stops ― all were fair game. When my filter for the fallacious began working at optimal speed, I’d metastasized 95% of what I’d digested, and honed in on the relevant.

The prognosis was bleak. Humans had been ― and were being ― fucked like a nymphomaniac porn actress.

The upside? Contrary to what we’ve been told by those causing our dilemmas, solutions are simple. ** *** **** Hence, peruse this publication with optimism. Shit may appear grim, but ― like a two-piece puzzle ― we can put things back together correctly in no time.

** Zeitgeist: Addendum:

*** Zeitgeist: Moving Forward:

**** Zeitgeist: The Movie:

Sources:

Movies:

Zeitgeist: Addendum. Dir. Peter Joseph. Perfs. Jacque Fresco, John Perkins. DVD, 2008

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward. Dir. Peter Joseph. Perfs. Gabor Mate, Robert Sapolsky. DVD, 2011

Zeitgeist: The Movie. Dir. Peter Joseph. Perfs. George Carlin, Bill Hicks, Jordan Maxwell. DVD, 2007

Online Movies:

Zeitgeist: Addendum:

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward:

Zeitgeist: The Movie:

HUMANITY: THE GRAND ILLUSION

"So if you think your life is complete confusion

Because your neighbor’s got it made

Just remember that it’s a Grand Illusion

Deep inside we’re all the same"

― Styx *

• Styx:

There was once a planet called Earth. Upon this diminutive blue-green ball ― for a while, anyway ― existed a species termed humans. Most of this breed falsely believed they were the only tenants of the Universe, or at least the pinnacle of the food chain. This, despite they knew not who they were, from whence they came, nor how to escape Earth should they need to.

Said feeble-minded lot spent the majority of their existence amassing strips of fabric ― known as cash ― that inherently had no value to them. Even while giant space rocks hurtled their way, ** humans took no notice, and continued engaging in this useless task. Provided numerous warnings, their need to court the insignificant was unquenchable.

** Near-Earth objects:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-Earth_asteroid

In addition to the meaningless accumulation of these swatches of fiber, humans decided it would be a great idea to separate from each other. Even though logic dictated they ally to save themselves from what seemed an omnipotent Universe, they rather chose to divide. As a result, what was known as countries ― complete with imaginary boundaries ― were created.

But sequestering ― by way of this new implement ― was not enough. It became essential the members of these fictitious territories kill their own, should they happen to reside in different regions. This humans called war, necessary to retaining the illusory borders of the illusory countries.

While natural forces ― known as diseases ― annihilated this breed with dexterity, humans felt the strong desire to assist, killing as many of each other as they could.

At some point, the most peremptory of these territories was known as the United States ― or U.S. for short. Members of this region were falsely led to believe ― via a system of propaganda known as school ― theirs was a special make-believe territory, espousing ethics never before entertained. In reality, the U.S. was founded upon the same tenets ― murder, rape and thievery ― as any other country.

Residents of the United States were forced to pledge compliance to die for their territory to another useless strip of fabric called the flag. While most of the U.S. population told themselves there’s was an ethical endeavor, their ancestors had massacred, forcibly fucked and stolen from the humans who had formerly inhabited this region. Afterward, they developed a holiday ― a gala ― and referred to it as Thanksgiving to commemorate this monumental extermination. The population of the United States celebrated this festival yearly, forgetting the mass of humanity erased, now represented by this jovial event.

All the while, the enormous asteroids continued to race toward Earth.

Although money didn’t exist, holidays helped create so much more of this apocryphal ideal, humans were unable to cease at one. Hence, Christmas, which exalted the birth of Jesus Christ ― a fictional godhead for which there was no historical basis. This holiday was celebrated by homage to a fat geriatric with the ability to visit every home on Earth in a single night. Said swollen senior commanded a sled powered by eight animals with no wings, that magically possessed a mastery of aerial navigation.

And then came Easter ― a festival observing the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, by pretending a monstrous rabbit left chocolate eggs during the night. ***

*** Bill Hicks:

Since self-annihilation seemed paramount to humanity, Memorial and Veterans Days were designed to provide gratitude to hired assassins ― termed soldiers ― able to kill more of their own than typical humans. ****

**** Bill Hicks:

Fictitious regions known as countries required equally fictitious leaders known as presidents. These nonexistent commanders ― who annihilated more people in one day than most soldiers during entire careers ― also possessed their own holiday.

But humans couldn’t stop with adoration only on certain dates. They felt the need to idolize these consummate killers all the time. Hence, cash was decorated with the faces of these pretend leaders.

George Washington ― a man who owned more than 300 slaves and would, in most eras, be incarcerated for such ― was the first of these presidents. ***** His memory was apotheosized in denominations of cash known as the quarter, as well as the dollar bill.

***** Jacque Fresco:

Abraham Lincoln ― an overt racist and mass murderer ― was glorified on currency called the penny, and the five dollar bill. ******

****** DiLorenzo, Thomas, J. (2006). Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe. Three Rivers Press. ISBN: 0307338428

President Andrew Jackson ― a lightly-toned human with proficiency for killing dark-toned humans ― was remembered on the 20 dollar bill. *******

******* Andrew Jackson:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Removal_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trail_of_Tears

This veneration wouldn’t be confined to presidents, though. Pretend protectors ― termed gods ― were imperative when controlling the population, should citizens become insurgent toward the imaginary rulers. Of course, these deities required homage. Over millennia, numerous gods came and went ― all dismissed as absurd by subsequent generations. None of these supreme beings were validated by physical evidence, and yet each was revered by the majority of humanity.

Noble traits were assigned these gods, which humans were informed they’d be judicious to emulate. This, even though the deity of the Jews ― a portion of humanity excluding itself from others ― commanded its adherents to slaughter, rape and plunder. ******** ********* The godhead of the Christians ― another chunk of humankind eager to separate themselves ― admonished those who failed to admire it, by doing so they’d be eternally burned and eaten alive.

******** www.evilbible.com

http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/murder-in-the-bible/

********* www.evilbible.com

http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/rape-in-the-bible/

Even without palpable proof of the existence of these deities, the bulk of humans declared belief in them, promulgating reverence again on cash. Hence the slogan “In God We Trust” on all forms of U.S. currency. Edicts of these gods were pronounced by individuals the ilk of Mother Teresa ― a fraud and mass murderer.

Although humans felt themselves shrewd for not believing the unsubstantiated word of a car salesman, they were willing to follow an invisible, silver-whiskered senior existing in an equally undetectable, gold city in the sky.

All this, while wayward asteroids sped toward Earth.

It appeared humanity thrived on delusion, and couldn’t have created a more pernicious paradigm.

And then came the Atomic Age ― an era during which this breed developed the capacity to exterminate itself. Prior, natural forces would have been the only cause for the extinguishment of humankind. Now, thanks to the ability to split, as well as fuse atoms, humans could eliminate their type in moments. This talent was captured in an invention called a bomb.

Thousands of these contraptions were made and pointed at each person on Earth. Hence, the entire population of this breed was minutes from nuclear demolition ― and would be for years ― although they’d done nothing to warrant such abuse. Oddly, humans did little to free themselves from this enslavement ― enabling the imaginary leaders to incarcerate by threat.

Even though humanity had the Sun at its disposal ― a source creating more energy in one second than humans produced in their entire existence ― leaders spuriously informed this breed it was exigent they split atoms. Hence, mammoth facilities ― termed nuclear power plants ― were developed, where this process was undergone. Humans were fallaciously informed this endeavor was safe. In reality, one meltdown ― a term denoting the unplanned destruction of a nuclear power plant ― could easily set in motion a chain of similar events that led to obliteration of this tiny species. In addition, humans had no means of storing the waste generated by this process; debris that would last for ― in certain cases ― billions of years. Excess that would be the most deadly substance known to humanity. **********

********** Into Eternity:

Not only did the leaders of this breed sanction all nuclear power plants, not one of these facilities was developed without cash from their respective dominions.

This decrepit domicile was built on the feeble foundation of a sole power grid that provided electricity to the humans, and also prevented all nuclear manufactories from melting down. Should that single fail-safe stop working ― as it had no back-up ― all nuclear power plants the Earth over would release their products, terminating life on the planet. ***********

*********** Smith, Gar. (2012). Nuclear Roulette: The Truth About the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603584340

Able to control via suppression, governments failed to inform citizens of these crucial facts ― which included the ability to overcome this problem by building a second power grid.

Such was the dilemma of humans. Their fate was their own to decide. As of this writing, it remains uncertain what became of this infant of the cosmos.

Sources:

Books:

DiLorenzo, Thomas, J. (2006). Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe. Three Rivers Press. ISBN: 0307338428

Smith, Gar. (2012). Nuclear Roulette: The Truth About the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth. Chelsea Green Publishing. ISBN: 9781603584340

Movies:

Into Eternity. Dir. Michael Madsen. Perfs. Timo Aikas, Carl Reinhold Brakenhjelm. DVD, 2010

Online Movies:

Into Eternity:

WORLD TRADE CENTER 7

"You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control all the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pockets, and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all the news and information you get to hear. They got ya’ by the balls.

[…] Well we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want. They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.

[…] They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fuckin’ years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers."

― George Carlin *

• George Carlin:

September 11, 2001. Some shit came down. From a cosmic context, it didn’t mean much, but for humanity, it was a game changer ― at the risk of sounding bromidic. A few thousand folk died in what the U.S. government alleges was a terrorist attack on domestic ground.

Let’s analyze the above pronouncement, and thereby dismiss it. Prior to humans, there was no domestic nor foreign soil. Planet Earth had land accessible to anyone, or anything. Altruistic of this celestial ball, don’t ya’ think?

Along came a sentient species, ravenous for control, and speciously divided up this gratuitous ground. Far before humans existed, and long after, their territorial boundaries ― from an empyrean standpoint ― didn’t mean anything. Thus, the ideology of domestic and foreign was solely implemented so some frightened control freak could retain what he, she or it perceived as domination.

Hence, no attack on domestic soil, as the ideas of domestic and foreign are meaningless.

Let’s move on, shall we?

Approximately 3,000 people perished on the aforementioned date, as a result of this incident. Again, within this paradigm, not a major deal, since thousands die every day. From a cosmic framework ― as there are countless species Universally ― not much of a dent.

Where proceedings do become important are on the microcosmic level. Even more imperative, September 11, 2001, left behind definitive evidence as to who’d been guilty of sabotage against humanity for some time.

Three steel-framed skyscrapers ― two 110 stories, another 47 floors tall ― were obliterated by two planes.

Let’s repeat this sentence, which defines the official government theory ― a hypothesis a significant percentage of Americans is no longer buying. Two planes demolish three buildings.

Two planes. Three buildings. Math that defies known logic, at this point.

According to the U.S. hegemony, these mammoth edifices were felled by office fires, generated by commercial airliners crashing into two of them. The structures in question were steel-framed skyscrapers ― a type of building that hadn’t prior, nor since, collapsed due to conflagration.

The following entry won’t impart extensive details regarding this event ― as such would require an entire book. However, this segment will provide meaty hunks of veracity blasting cannonball holes in the tenuous hypothesis the American government provides us all.

Let’s revisit simple mathematics: two planes, three structures.

That equation alone should cause people to inquire, “What the fuck―?!?”

Since a capacious faction don’t realize there was a third building ― World Trade Center 7 ― that disintegrated on September 11, few query what we’ve been told.

Let’s start with the most obvious problem regarding the official report of 9/11. There are two main suspects implicated in this crime: al-Qaeda and the U.S. government, itself. The latter was tasked ― via the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) ― to determine what transpired on September, 11, 2001. The aforementioned are government organizations.

How often does one find a main suspect to a crime allowed to solve that malfeasance? By this rationale, shouldn’t al-Qaeda be provided the opportunity to investigate this transgression, as well?

We’re left to ponder the fact not only had no other steel-framed skyscraper in history collapsed due to fire, but three such edifices, on a single day, in the same locale, came to this demise.

Since we’ve addressed problems posed by basic math ― in opposition to the official theory ― let’s move on to dilemmas caused by simple physics. Via NIST, the government would have us believe all 267 stories of World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 toppled due to warping steel, resultant of office fires. It’s well known such blazes can reach nowhere near the temperature required to accomplish this.

"Structural steel does not begin to melt until it reaches about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit. NIST does not suggest that any of the steel in WTC 7 [World Trade Center Building 7] came anywhere close to this temperature. Its most extravagant claim is that some of the beams reached 1,250 degrees Fahrenheit." **

** Griffin, David Ray. (2010). The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Official Report About 9/11 is Unscientific and False. Olive Branch Press. ISBN: 9781566567862

Melting and warping steel happen at different temperatures, but office blazes could never have burnt so virulently to collapse a 47 story skyscraper, let alone two buildings, each 110 floors tall. In addition, what could have caused pools of molten iron, molybdenum and steel found in the World Trade Center rubble? Temperatures necessary for the above to be present could never have been generated by office fires, but would definitely have been a result of explosives. Infernos within the aftermath raged for weeks ― an occurrence impossible due to the low-level heat produced by smoldering office equipment.

"NIST itself reported that it found no evidence that any of [the steel in the Twin Towers] had reached temperatures above 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit. NIST also explicitly stated that the fires in the towers could not have melted any steel." ***

*** IBID.

Copious proof of nano-thermite and thermate ― both products of highly-charged explosives ― were found in the ruins of WTC 1, 2 and 7. Office fires could not have produced these incendiary footprints.

We discover that numerous steel-frame skyscrapers throughout history had endured infernos much greater than those witnessed on 9/11, but none fell as a result.

In 1988, a blaze burned in the First Interstate Bank of Los Angeles for three and a half hours, yet the building failed to collapse. An inferno in 1991 engulfed a skyscraper at One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia for 18 hours, but didn’t bring the structure down. A high-rise pyre continued 17 hours in Caracas, Venezuela, and the massive edifice remained standing.

Contrary to the infernos within these three buildings, fires in World Trade Center 7, as well as WTC 1 and 2, were dying. Blazes in these structures emitted black, opaque smoke, and were thus going out. As anyone who’s built a fire in a fireplace will note, flames burning hottest emit little exhaust, and those dwindling ― thus least hot ― produce copious amounts of dark smoke. This was evidenced by fires in all three buildings that collapsed at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Additionally, according to NIST, these blazes were fueled by office furnishings, which were designed to be flame-retardant. Columns and supporting beams of WTC 1, 2 and 7 were also coated with fire-proofing products.

As anybody can deduce ― via online videos of the World Trade Center collapses ― buildings were brought down in a controlled, symmetrical fashion. Since the official theory asserts these edifices endured disparate fires on various floors, shouldn’t the skyscrapers have come down in a disorderly way? Previous to, and after these occurrences, the only method by which structures near these magnitudes were destroyed was controlled demolition.

For WTC 7 to have fallen in the fashion it did ― precisely into its own footprint ― it would be necessary 82 structural columns demolish at the same rate, at the same time. It’s a physical impossibility a series of office fires could have caused such a scenario.

Then we have the problem of the evidence itself. Before an investigation could commence, the government carted the remaining portions of all three structures to China and India, and melted it down. Isn’t this destruction of evidence, and thereby obstruction of justice?

The Jersey Girls ― a group of widows, due to the events of that day ― generated sufficient notoriety to force the government to launch a halfhearted and weak investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. This being said, the accuracy of NIST’s findings is highly questionable, as its conclusions were based upon computer simulations, as opposed to the evidence, itself. Variables were fabricated by this government agency, until “sufficient” results were obtained. Even so, the National Institute of Standards and Technology was unable to reproduce what ensued on 9/11, and their conclusions defied known laws of physics.

In the end, 118 of 503 firefighters interviewed on site professed to experiencing, hearing or seeing explosives in use during the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7. Such testimony has been labeled inadmissible in the final NIST report.

Eyewitness corroboration via Barry Jennings and Michael Hess ― deputy director of the Emergency Services Department of the New York City Housing Authority; and New York City’s chief lawyer, respectively ― was dismissed by NIST. Both individuals were inside WTC 7 shortly before the building came down, and both maintained experiencing explosions within the edifice.

And what of NIST’s admission Building 7 collapsed for 2.25 seconds at free fall acceleration? This is equivalent to dropping a bowling ball off a roof. Physics a child can understand prove if something obstructs this object, it’s descent speed will decrease. The only way the ball can drop at the rate of gravity would be if nothing impeded it. This constant remains true for WTC 7. For this structure to have fallen at freefall speed, the edifice below the descending floors would had to have been removed. This feat is unattainable via office fires, but can easily be accomplished through controlled demolition. Even when not collapsing at free-fall speed, both WTC 7, as well as Buildings 1 and 2, dropped at a velocity so close to that of gravity, such could only have been caused by regulated destruction.

None of the above even addresses the official theory concerning the Pentagon, nor an open field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, which were also targets during September 11, 2001.

The former is obviously one of the most surveilled buildings on the planet. One wouldn’t be surprised to discover closed-circuit television cameras in the toilets of this edifice, and yet five frames of video is all we’re provided to explain what happened here during 9/11? According to the government theory, a jumbo jet crashed into the Pentagon, but these five frames provide no such evidence. We’ve an ambiguous explosion into the building in question, caused by nothing in particular. All this from one of the most secure facilities on Earth. Should an hegemony wish to dispel contradictory conclusions, why wouldn’t they produce exhaustive footage ― which they obviously possess ― that would end the dilemma once and for all?

How did Flight 93 near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, evaporate ― when no other airliner in history has, upon impact with soft ground?

Again, this segment is solely meant to address ― in broad terms ― World Trade Center 7, a building approximately 50% of Americans, until recently, didn’t even realize collapsed. Hence, details regarding WTC 1, 2, the Pentagon and Shanksville will be saved for a later entry.

Before moving on to the next chapter, though, ask yourself: Do you think a ragtag group of individuals living in caves could have pulled off a mission of this magnitude against the most technologically advanced nation on Earth?

One would either have to be ignorant, or severely retarded, in order to believe what the U.S. government is asserting regarding 9/11.

Sources:

Books:

Griffin, David Ray. (2010). The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Official Report About 9/11 is Unscientific and False. Olive Branch Press. ISBN: 9781566567862

Movies:

9/11: Blueprint for Truth — The Architecture of Destruction. Dir. Ken Jenkins. Perfs. Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin. DVD, 2008

9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out. Dir. Richard Gage. Perfs. David Ray Griffin, Niels Harrit, Robert E. McCoy, Tom Sullivan. DVD, 2012

9/11: Press for Truth. Dir. Ray Nowosielski. Perfs. Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg, Lorie Van Auken. DVD, 2006

Online Movies:

9/11: Blueprint for Truth — The Architecture of Destruction:

9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out:

9/11: Press for Truth:

MOTHER TERESA

"Religion has actually convinced people that there’s an invisible man living in the sky, who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live, and suffer, and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever, ’til the end of time…

But he loves you. […]

He loves you, and he needs money."

― George Carlin *

• George Carlin:

Mother Teresa has been called many things: a martyr, a living saint, an inspiration. But allow me be the first to call her a cunt.

Too harsh? You have no problems referring to Adolf Hitler by that label, since he was a mass murderer. Well, so too was Mom T. Thus, why not afford her the same irreverence?

How else should one refer to an individual who hoarded money ― had more than she could count ― and refused to spend it on the infirm and suffering? What about a personage who coerced others to agonize and die when their afflictions were easily treatable? How about a thief, ready to steal in order to stock her own, private cache?

Well, Mother Teresa was all of the above, and so much more. Shall we add fraud to her list of accomplishments, since she convinced the majority of humans she was an appendage of some divine deity, although nothing could be further from the truth?

You hear it all the time. The invocation of her name, as though it holds pious veneration we should all aspire to.

“I’m caring, but I’m no Mother Teresa.”

“Like Mother Teresa, I try to do more good.”

“What would Mother Teresa do?”

Why not disclose this cheat for what she was ― solely another parlor trick in the bag of the Catholic Church to expand its membership of paying devotees?

The needle perforated the tenuous skin of the youth. His flesh was paper-thin, almost diaphanous in the lackluster light of the Home for the Dying in Calcutta. This was headquarters for Mother Teresa. The teenage boy ― suffering from a malady easily curable at the hospital down the road ― was being allowed to rot and die, as per the aforementioned’s decree. By daybreak, he’d be dead. He wasn’t the first, and so long as Mom T’s foot soldiers were allowed to practice their perverted penitence, wouldn’t be the last.

Categorized the Missionaries of Charity (MC), Mother Teresa’s followers are portrayed in a righteous light. In reality, their apotheosized leader — no better than a Marshall Applewhite or Jim Jones — instructed her adherents it was necessary they agonize to find redemption.

This contemptible woman’s catalyst was suffering. She thought because we’re told Jesus endured great pain in his death, we all should, too. Thus, we would become more Christ-like. By such a maniacal motivation, wouldn’t our agony also make us more akin to murderers executed in the electric chair?

Via Mother Teresa’s logic, shouldn’t those of us who suffer prior to death now all be closer to William Kemmler ― a man who hacked his girlfriend to bits with an axe? A man who also endured insane amounts of pain when his execution was mismanaged. A man who fried to death for several minutes, causing the electric chair chamber to wreak with the nauseating stench of searing meat.

By Mother Teresa’s reasoning, shouldn’t this convicted killer also be closer to Christ, since he suffered greatly?

This lunacy can be exemplified by a filmed interview with Mother Teresa, in which she related an exchange she had with a cancer patient. The individual in question was in the final stages of the disease, and agonizing immensely. Mommy T leaned in, asserting, “You are suffering like Christ on the cross. So Jesus must be kissing you.”

The anguished patient responded with, “Then please tell him to stop kissing me.”

While folks in Mother Teresa’s care ― or lack thereof ― were dying in droves, provided insufficient medical treatment, this living saint was seen to by the finest of physicians, when she became ill.

Mary Louden ― who volunteered at the Home for the Dying ― had the following to impart:

"They’re not being given a great deal of medical care. They’re not being given painkillers really beyond aspirin and maybe if you’re lucky some Brufen or something, for the sort of pain that goes with terminal cancer […].

They didn’t have enough drips. The needles they used and re-used over and over and over and you would see some of the nuns rinsing needles under the cold water tap. And I asked one of them why she was doing it and she said: 'Well to clean it.' And I said, 'Yes, but why are you not sterilizing it; why are you not boiling water and sterilizing your needles?' She said, 'There’s no point. There’s no time.'

The first day I was there when I finished working in the women’s ward I went and waited on the edge of the men’s ward for my boyfriend, who was looking after a boy of fifteen who was dying, and an American doctor told me that she had been trying to treat this boy. And that he had a really relatively simple kidney complaint that had simply got worse and worse and worse because he hadn’t had antibiotics. And he actually needed an operation. I don’t recall what the problem was, but she did tell me. And she was so angry, but also very resigned which so many people become in that situation. And she said, 'Well, they won’t take him to hospital.' And I said: 'Why? All you have to do is get a cab. Take him to the nearest hospital, demand that he has treatment. Get him an operation.'

She said: 'They don’t do it. They won’t do it. If they do it for one, they do it for everybody.' And I thought ― but this kid is fifteen."

The aforementioned example ― indicative of the adoration Mother Teresa bestowed upon her patients ― may cause one to surmise the MC was broke. Little could be more incorrect.

When asked how much money the Missionaries of Charity possesses, Sister Nirmala Joshi ― Mother Teresa’s successor ― responded:

"Countless…Countless […]. It is difficult, in a sense, to keep on counting all the time […]. Only God knows. You can ask him."

Susan Shields ― who spent close to 10 years as a Missionary of Charity ― asserted:

"Our bank account was already the size of a great fortune and increased with every postal service delivery. Around $50 million had collected in one checking account in the Bronx…Those of us who worked in the office regularly understood that we were not to speak about our work. The donations rolled in and were deposited in the bank, but they had no effect on our ascetic lives or on the lives of the poor we were trying to help."

Even though Mother Teresa made the following attestation:

"We have to do God’s will in everything. We also take a special vow which other congregations don’t take; that of giving wholehearted free service to the poor. This vow means that we cannot work for the rich; neither can we accept any money for the work we do. Ours has to be a free service, and to the poor."

The fact is, the MC receives ample amounts of cash from bureaucracies, big business and affluent individuals.

Over the years, Mother Teresa had been bestowed innumerable awards ― among them the Nobel Peace Prize, in addition to India’s Prize of the Miraculous Lotus. These adulations often garner a generous dollar amount, which the Missionaries of Charity retains in its treasury.

In addition, according to Colette Livermore ― 11 year member of the MC ― Mother Teresa was not above groveling. In fact, she’d send her stooges into the streets ― pretending her institution was insolvent ― to beg for handouts. Mother Teresa, herself, literally always had her palm presented to accept any donation, large or small.

Although the MC have stockpiled more than enough money to fund the finest medical facilities in the land, they refuse proper treatment to those in need. Any credible medical institution would be indictable as a result. Because we’re talking an association under the auspices of the Church, this barbarity is overlooked.

The Home for the Dying is deluged with emaciated, agonizing individuals, given little more than cots for comfort ― while the Missionaries of Charity has more money than it knows what to do with. All this while signs about the building read: “I am on my way to heaven.”

But the amassing of funds wasn’t solely kept from those at death’s door; it was also concealed from those seeking simple necessities, like roofs over their heads. Miss Elgy Gillespie ― columnist and writer ― experienced firsthand the push for pain Mother Teresa commanded, when she visited a San Francisco affiliate of the MC:

"Sent to cook in her hostel, tactfully named 'The Gift of Love' (it is for homeless men with HIV), I found a dozen or so very sick men; but those who weren’t very sick were exceptionally depressed, because they were not allowed to watch TV or smoke or drink or have friends over. Even when they were dying, close friends were not allowed. They are never allowed to drink, even at the funerals of their friends and roommates […].

A Guatemalan writer that I befriended there was desperate to get out, so a friend of mine who was also there adopted him for as long as she could. He became much sicker and when she begged him to go back because she couldn’t mind him, he begged her to keep him because he knew they didn’t medicate enough, or properly, and was afraid he would have to die without morphine."

According to Susan Shields:

"In the Bronx, plans were being made to establish a new home for the poor. Many of the homeless were sick and needed more permanent accommodations than that offered by our night shelter. We had bought a large abandoned building from the city for one dollar. A co-worker offered to be the contractor and arranged for an architect to draw up plans for the renovations. Government regulations required that an elevator be installed for the use of the disabled. Mother would not allow an elevator. The city offered to pay for the elevator. Its offer was refused. After all the negotiations and plans, the project for the poor was abandoned because an elevator for the handicapped was unacceptable."

All this while the coffers of the MC were overflowing with riches ― cash the order was forbade from spending either on the indigent, or themselves.

Perhaps the most renowned donations to the Missionaries of Charity were made by Charles Keating. Said individual masterminded the infamous 1980s Savings and Loan opprobrium, during which he purloined exorbitant amounts of money from ignorant investors. What resulted was a bailout ― using taxpayer cash ― to the extent never before seen.

In 1992, Mr. Keating was indicted, and placed on trial for his duplicitous actions, but not before granting roughly $1,250,000 to the MC. Keating provided money and a private jet to Mother Teresa, while the demented Albanian nun offered a falsely ethical reputation in exchange.

In conclusion, Keating would be sentenced to prison, and Mother Teresa ― knowing full well the aforementioned donations were stolen ― refused to return the cash. In addition, Mom T wrote a plea to the court seeking leniency on behalf of ol’ Chaz.

Mr. Paul Turley ― Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles, and Keating’s co-prosecutor ― sent the following letter to Mother Teresa. He never received a response:

"I am a Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles County and one of the persons who worked on the prosecution of your benefactor, Charles H. Keating, Jr. I read your letter to Judge Ito, written on behalf of Mr. Keating, which includes your admission that you know nothing about Mr. Keating’s business or the criminal charges presented to Judge Ito. I am writing to you to provide a brief explanation of the crimes of which Mr. Keating has been convicted, to give you an understanding of the source of the money that Mr. Keating gave to you, and to suggest that you perform the moral and ethical act of returning the money to its rightful owners.

Mr. Keating was convicted of defrauding 17 individuals of more than $900,000. These 17 persons were representative of 17,000 individuals from whom Mr. Keating stole $252,000,000. Mr. Keating’s specific acts of fraud were that he was the source of a series of fraudulent representations made to persons who bought bonds from his company and he also was the repository of crucial information which he chose to withhold from bond purchasers, thereby luring his victims into believing they were making a safe, low-risk investment. In truth and in fact, their money was being used to fund Mr. Keating’s exorbitant and extravagant lifestyle.

The victims of Mr. Keating’s fraud come from a wide spectrum of society. Some were wealthy and well-educated. Most were people of modest means and unfamiliar with high finance. One was, indeed, a poor carpenter who did not speak English and had his life savings stolen by Mr. Keating’s fraud.

The biblical slogan of your organization is 'As long as you did it to one of these My least brethren. You did it to Me.' The “least” of the brethren are among those whom Mr. Keating fleeced without flinching. As you well know, divine forgiveness is available to all, but forgiveness must be preceded by admission of sin. Not only has Mr. Keating failed to admit his sins and his crimes, he persists in self-righteously blaming others for his own misdeeds. Your experience is, admirably, with the poor. My experience has been with the “con” man and the perpetrator of the fraud. It is not uncommon for “con” men to be generous with family, friends and charities. Perhaps they believe that their generosity will purchase love, respect and forgiveness. However, the time when the purchase of “indulgences” was an acceptable method of seeking forgiveness died with the Reformation. No church, no charity, no organization should allow itself to be used as salve for the conscience of the criminal. We all are grateful that forgiveness is available but we all, also, must perform our duty. That includes the Judge and the Jury. I remind myself of the biblical admonition of the Prophet Micah: 'O man, what is good and what does the Lord require of you. To do justice, love mercy and walk humbly.'

We are urged to love mercy but we must do justice.

You urge Judge Ito to look into his heart ― as he sentences Charles Keating ― and do what Jesus would do. I submit the same challenge to you. Ask yourself what Jesus would do if he were given the fruits of a crime; what Jesus would do if he were in possession of money that had been stolen; what Jesus would do if he were being exploited by a thief to ease his conscience?

I submit that Jesus would promptly and unhesitatingly return the stolen property to its rightful owners. You would do the same. You have been given money by Mr. Keating that he has been convicted of stealing by fraud. Do not permit him the “indulgence” he desires. Do not keep the money. Return it to those who worked for it and earned it!

If you contact me I will put you in direct contact with the rightful owners of the property now in your possession.

Sincerely,

Paul W. Turley"

Emily Lewis ― a nurse who has spent much of her time toiling in Third World destinations ― asked the pertinent question:

"Is it going too far to liken Mother Teresa to some of our infamous televangelists, turning their audiences on to what is in God’s heart and mind while encouraging and accepting all donations?"

To paraphrase the late Christopher Hitchens, those in more affluent countries sleep much better at night believing ― whether truthfully or not ― someone is taking care of the poor. As a result, individuals in prosperous portions of the world tend to ask few questions when it comes to the true stewardship of the impoverished. Believing the Missionaries of Charity are helping ― even if such isn’t the case ― is all we need.

When it came down to it, Mother Teresa was no more than an exalted cult leader. Not only are patients of her convent coerced into pain and suffering, so too are nuns of the MC, who live in bare, impoverished conditions. While in their places of residence, it’s mandatory sisters remain silent, except when taking meals. Besides their garment, “[s]oap, a comb, toothbrush and paste” are all the necessities provided them. Three hours a day are allotted to prayer. Novices to the order must wear chains with “inward-pointing spikes” to perforate the skin around their waist while praying in the morning. It’s compulsory neophytes whip their bare thighs a specific amount with “a knotted rope” in private bathrooms, following nightly meals.

All sisters eat a strictly regimented appropriation, and are provided no more, should they remain hungry. Dishes are washed with ash, as opposed to detergent. Showers are taken using a bucket ― the same in which clothes are cleaned.

Missionaries are coerced to speak the Rosary aloud, whilst in public, appearing like crazed cult members. Outside of specified religious texts, books are not allowed. Newspapers and television are forbidden.

Familial bonds become tenuous, as families are permitted to visit sisters one day a month. Missionaries are not to call their loved ones, and can write them once every 30 days.

Does the above sound more restricting than most maximum security prisons? Moreover, how does making people suffer help the poor?

So immovable were Mother Teresa’s beliefs, she once claimed if given the choice between Galileo’s assertion of heliocentrism and the contention of the Inquisition, she would have backed the Church. Recall, heliocentrism is the scientific fact Earth, and all other planets in this Solar system, revolve around the Sun. This cosmic truth was denied and suppressed by the Catholic authorities ― who spuriously insisted, for over 200 years, all celestial bodies rotate around the planet on which we live.

Although Mother Teresa professed to being a strict disciple of Catholicism, her private writings reflect otherwise:

"When I try to raise my thoughts to heaven there is such convicting emptiness….I am told God loves me ― and yet the reality [is] of darkness and coldness."

Mom T “wanted to ‘tell the truth ― that [she had] no faith’ but remained silent. She felt Jesus had left her alone to walk in the darkness.” **

** Livermore, Colette. (2008). Hope Endures: Leaving Mother Teresa, Losing Faith, and Searching for Meaning. Free Press. ISBN: 9781416593614

Mother Teresa asserted “She had so many ‘unanswered questions’ within her, but she was ‘afraid to uncover them ― because of the blasphemy.’ She prayed, ‘If there be God please forgive me.’” ***

*** IBID.

How could anyone, with even a semblance of conscience, be witness to such suffering, and not wonder why God’s been on a lunch break?

What does it say about the Catholic church if the best it has to offer is a crook, a cult leader, an impostor and a serial killer?

Sources:

Books:

Hitchens, Christopher. (1995). The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice. Twelve. ISBN: 9781455523009

Livermore, Colette. (2008). Hope Endures: Leaving Mother Teresa, Losing Faith, and Searching for Meaning. Free Press. ISBN: 9781416593614

Online Movies:

Hell's Angel:

Shaming Mother Teresa:

The preceding blog was written by Hugh Mungus. Feel free to contact the author directly here on Steemit, or via his personal E-mail address: [email protected]