Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 280) in the WOX
The idea of "Talk Channel"
The Talk channel was created to share ideas and address any questions or concerns you may have. It's open to everyone; therefore, I invite you to participate by sharing your concerns, questions, answers, and ideas related to the platform.
"Talk channel" se creó para compartir ideas y responder a cualquier pregunta o inquietud que puedan tener. Está abierto a todos; por lo tanto, los invito a participar compartiendo sus inquietudes, preguntas, respuestas e ideas relacionadas con la plataforma.
Theme this week:
| # | Questions, Answers and Comments | Preguntas, Respuestas y Comentarios |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | In your opinion, would it be ideal if the Steemit challenge were expanded to more communities each month, how many and what would the schedule be like? | ¿En tu opinión, sería ideal que el reto Steemit se expandiera a más comunidades cada mes, cuántas serían y cómo sería el cronograma? |
| 2 | Based on your experience on social media, where do you think it would be impactful to promote Steem and Steemit, have you done it? | Basándote en tu experiencia en redes sociales, ¿dónde crees que sería impactante promocionar Steem y Steemit? ¿Lo has hecho? |
| 3 | Have you used SteemHub to learn about engagement performance in a community or tag you're interested in, what can we highlight about it? | ¿Has utilizado SteemHub para conocer el rendimiento de la participación en una comunidad o etiqueta que te interesa? ¿Qué podemos destacar al respecto? |
These and other points we can discuss during this week.
Estos y otros puntos los podemos discutir durante esta semana.
Participate by leaving your comments, questions or answers here.
Participa, dejando su comentario, preguntas o respuestas aquí.
The post "Talk Channel" is published weekly, every Monday and is open to everyone the whole week. And there we should all appreciate comments and responses to each other.
El post "Canal de conversación " se publica semanalmente, todos los lunes y está abierto a todo el mundo durante toda la semana. Y en él, todos debemos agradecer los comentarios y las respuestas de los demás.
Everyone is invited to speak on the topics of their choice.
| Tell us a little bit about your "experience, criteria and/or doubts" regarding the Steemit platform, have the opportunity to answer or join other comments that the community may be making in the channel. | Cuéntanos un poco sobre tu "experiencia, criterio y/o dudas" con respecto a la plataforma Steemit, ten la oportunidad de responder o unirte a otros comentarios que la comunidad pueda estar haciendo en el canal. |
|---|
We also invite other connoisseurs of the subject to present themselves here on "Talk Channel"."
In the "talk channel" we or you can also post a topic that needs a review, for example tools on Steem or other things you want to know about
| SteemWorld.org Built | WORLD OF XPILAR | |
|---|---|---|
 |  |
Responsibility moderator for "Talk Channel" is @adeljose
Regards
@mister-omortson @art-venture @stef1 @myskye @sultan-aceh
@franyeligonzalez @axeman @xpilar @bambuka, @the-gorilla, @petface, @o1eh, @hardphotographer and @adeljose
3/ Наконец-то я начинаю понимать эти вечные поиски кураторами качественного контента на Steemit. Желание наградить хороший контент прекрасно.
При этом стоит учесть, что Steemit не сможет купить весь качественный контент, который есть в интернете. Поэтому наверное "качество" должно включать в себя несколько варьирующихся критериев: глубина, новизна, общительность автора, финансовое поведение автора.
Во всем этом мне особенно интересно желание расширить охват пользователей курированием. Многие пользователи Steemit постят хороший контент при регулярных наградах. Но цель не собрать как можно больше контента, а курировать как можно больше пользователей. Это значит немного снизить требования к "качеству" для большего "количества". Проще всего это сделать составив список награждаемых авторов и стараться дополнять этот список.
Интересно проверить, учитывает ли эти критерии рекомендуемая программа обзора.
Посмотрела предложенную программу статистики: количество постов, количество слов в постах, самые активные авторы, принадлежность к клубам. Похоже, в курировании всё гораздо проще, чем мы думаем.
0.00 SBD,
3.85 STEEM,
3.85 SP
That's not per se the case. It also means that you can not receive an upvote, no matter how active you are because you are downvoting, Does that make sense? Perhaps to some, the reality is that sooner or later most steemians will for one reason or another.
@ wakeupkitty
No idea what you mean but it sounds you want to go back to the SEC situation where friends were benefited, no one cared about good and comment were AI generated. Or am I wrong?
Steem and Steemit should be promoted but there isn't one place where this can be done best. Many seem only to have access if they use VPN next to fact the platforms like X, Instagram and you name block many posts so you are never sure what others can see.
The only option I see is if the "name" is integrated in personal/"average" sites of users worldwide for its visibility. Sites that can or will not be banned by google.
Removing the @hive-xxxx didn't help to make posts visible and since AI is the first info sourch and people believe everything is true this means Steemit doesn't exist.
No, not recently.
The overview is useless for me. It doesn't show what I am looking for unlike what @aneukpineung78 built.
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.97 SP
Greetings, friend @wakeupkitty
I'm referring to community participation in the Steemit challenge. For example, I can say that it would be a good idea to select 20 communities each month, with 5 of those communities hosting the challenges each week (4 weeks per month).
It's true that some social networks are very sensitive about the content shared on them. On the other hand, people are now limiting themselves to using AI to generate content and images, which is crippling businesses related to this topic. There's a challenge ahead in trying to reach more people.
What difference can you share with us between the two apps?
So you want the SEC concept back.
I doubt more AI generated text appear it always been there.
People post, communities have their contests and no way there will an increasement of "good content". This besides if the fact no one knows what good is and the average Steemian is not creative.
What you want is the same communities ruling and dominating how Steemit should look like,a platform where a niche or topic will again be invisible, 5 steps backwards.
Will this help Steemit to grow? Why not start and reward commenting more?
Thr difference is that this is just an overview of who knows what (not a single link, no way to check of what is counted is content that fits to the tag. Hashtag abuse is sky high. After all those years people still have no clue what the use of a hashtag is. Kind of sad and if we manage to make Steemit visible we better work on thati like to see the list with hashtags back, the best. Communitues could set a few unless it's not a topic any sane person person would use to google.
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.14 SP
I find your point of view interesting, wanting to expand the scope of support, but you want to summarize it as supporting comments. The example I'm giving is intended to make more communities visible, because the range of prominence will be greater, and not limit the power of selection to a few.
I agree that we should promote awareness about the proper use of hashtags and quality content (which we do find) on Steemit, beyond our own preferences.