You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Witness Update: minimum_account_creation_fee

in #witness-update6 years ago

It's funny that one of the main vectors of "abuse" is a centralized entity that processes most account creation on what's supposed to be a "decentralized" blockchain. Also, don't current stakeholders benefit from higher account creation minimums...

Guess we won't have real discussions of how to actually retain users and grow past 100k users until such a level of activity won't throttle the network, so it may all just be moot points for now.

Sort:  

It's about making sure that the network can't be abused by people creating thousands of accounts due to the low price.

Those claims in the quote... ¡Are Simple Excuses!

«««-$-»»»

Nah! @charitybot. I suspect this rush to increase from 0.100 STEEM to 0.200 STEEM the minimum_account_creation_fee by witnesses, Bidbots owners/operators with an approval vote and in general, every 'bug with nails' with stake 'authority' within steemit and the steem blockchain on these matters. Is just an optimistic proposal by these specimens to have the ability to squeeze up the shell and suck asap from the public pool with a bigger straw as much steem juice as they can, filling their already large bellies with exponential amounts of that juice before Tuesday, September 25, at 11:00am EST.

Before the new RCs schemes to create steemit's accounts make disappear a few teeth to their current forks to carve more wealth through their 'private' endeavors. };)

I didn't say what you're quoting, so you're replying to the wrong person.

Ah C'mon @charitybot... ¡That's obvious that you didn't say what I am quoting!

It was that with your reply you simply served a formidable bread bed on the table so that I filled it with my tasty extravagance to make a 'yummy' sandwich that everyone can gobble with gluttony!!! };)

Well, as long as more people can see the real reasons anyone would do any of this, I'm fine with that.

¡That's the spirit!

Cheers!! :)