You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @timcliff's Witness Hardfork Approval Standards v0.1

in #witness-category6 years ago

IMO there is a role for both automated tests, and 'human' tests. The amount of people that are qualified to understand and properly audit the automated tests is very limited. If we rely on people being able to do this in order to properly test, we will be significantly underutilizing the resources we have (i.e. the community members who may not understand C++, but are willing to spend time playing around in the testnet).

Sort:  

Agreed, automated tests can only account for a certain number of cases. Unpredictable humans will always find ways to use a system beyond what the developers intended.
Your proposal above is good.