I really don''t want to be that guy who rips a fellow researcher however there are a number of factual inaccuracies I need to address.

First, those are not Guy Fawkes mask that you call "anonymous mask" in your article.

Second, I know several people referenced in the old CypherPunks wired magazine not sure why you referenced all of them.

Third, the person you referenced has no idea what they are talking about on Quroa you can search someone by their email address.

"US, UK & Australian MSM" - London Independent and Counter Punch aren't MSM. The Australian and SMH are though.

Assange received over 1 million documents because of his vast network as you layed out in this article.

I am not sure where you see that Assange stole those documents from that article you referenced?

Tor was partially "secure" up until when the FBI found an exploit a few users ago which honestly didn't affect anonymity of those properly using
tor with flashplayer and java script disabled.

Although it was first a project by the U.S.navy and many of us have always suspected backdoors.

"Syphoning the internet traffic and selling it to the highest bidder, including intelligence agencies, is a multi-billion dollar business."

Yes but not needed if they already run fake honeypot nodes to catch users on tor.

Taking the internet down is as easy as pulling the switch on the 13 root DNS servers with a sophisticated DDoS attack.

"Final paragraph confirms that Advisory Board positions are unpaid - Wikileaks did not need $5 Million!"

Mate they pay the people vetting documents as well as people who work social media, marketing etc it's a business focused on exposing
corruption made up of a shit ton of people brought together through the internet.

"Aids us in projection" not "aids us in protection" you changed the email he said projection what he was referring to is projection of value how much the site would be worth.

"Unquestioning obedience" defined is total, and given without thinking, asking questions, or doubting: Like all tyrannical leaders, he demanded unquestioning obedience from his followers.

So when they stated we don't believe in unquetioning obedience from authority he was saying we don't believe in not questioning authority i.e. asking the difficult questions.

Wikileaks has exposed Soros:
https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=George+Soros

The reason for the press attention was the Iraq war and everyone on the left wanted a leak at the time to destroy Bush.

There was also a lot of promotion at the time for Wikileaks even though you claim there wasn't.

Desired perception is referring to the overall perception of what Wikileaks is.

"Reading Assange’s invention of language reference reminds me of George Orwell’s 1984 doublespeak and newspeak!"

Cryptography and creating your own language is essential Assange no doubt knew about PROMIS and FBI's carnivore as well as the NSA back then.

So using encryption and key phrases to talk in secret is a major important thing to be established.

"OUR’ strategy to foster ‘division and support’" goes back to the old saying "no press is bad press."

As for the Soros and CIA allegation of funding of Wikileaks a tax record would prove the transfer of money to Open Society Foundation.

They sought out the money of Soros that's the only thing those emails prove not that a deal was finalized.

Are some of Wikileaks contributors intelligence personnel? Absolutely but not everyone in intelligence is an New World Order stooge.

Finally, the emails that John Young leaked on Cryptome years ago are interesting but not conclusive that Wikileaks is ran by CIA.

It's possible but you didn't provide conclusive evidence. I am not sure what happened between Young and Assange but some bad blood went on between the two.

Overall this article is filled with a lot of speculation and inaccuracies if that is how you want to roll go for it but I deal with facts and documents.

I am sorry but I can't take defamation of some great people who do good work at WL it's not a one man operation ran by Assange far from it the group consists of journalist, lawyers, technocrats and more.