Sort:  

oh you! how did you dare?!
get this!!!

Hope some eyes get on this from #waronspam and maybe @stellabelle

I’m not some crazy conspiracist. There is legitimate proven abuse and corruption by those who volunteer (for profit) to cleanse the system.

They bemoan being abused, meanwhile destroying the eco system with TOS violations, double standards, favoritism and hypocrisy.

This is a bigger issue than Joe Anonymous spamming 1000 accounts.

This is people paying each other to destroy accounts of people with different opinions. FREEDOM!!!

Who knows, it might even be illegal.

I downvoted your comments that were meant to dox the private information of another user on this platform.

I haven’t done that - unless you are referring to a first name, or links to spamming by that user both inside and outside of steemit. Perhaps a first name was too much?

It’s trivial to set up more accounts - as certain members in steemcleaners can attest. You need a moral review of your group pfunk. From what I’ve seen, it’s not the entire group.

@patrice is great!!

Maybe I shouldn’t have posted a first name, I don’t feel great about it.

Then again, maybe I shouldn’t have been targeted, my post not flagged in the first place, my appeals questions answered, my post unflagged after I edited it to comply and was reviewed by @patrice.

Not unreasonable right?

I went through every avenue to get this resolved - multiple times.

Posting private personal info to try to get back at someone went too far.

Fair enough, I’ll delete that 1 comment - a response to bot army takedown.

It’s gone.

Still, everything I’ve mentioned above is fact. Review your team!!

I removed one downvote from you but by deleting that comment I can't remove the more powerful downvote any more.

Thanks pfunk.

Don’t worry about it. He has single handedly made this account worthless with his bots and access to adm, and steemcleaners power.

Btw, followed. Your actions and responses put you in the same basket as @patrice. A good guy/girl

Steemcleaners is reviewing and solidifying our scope. In my opinion it should not include downvoting referral links.

That doesn't mean I might not act on my own to warn people then downvote people promoting obvious scams like ponzis.

what if referral link is called referral link in the text of the post? I did that and my post was flagged. I mean, it's not like I was hiding that it's referral link. What's the problem with those links anyway?
I agree, not everyone checks the actual address they clicked, but when it's called "referral link" you should be brain-dead to click it and think it's not referral =)

Update
oh @pfunk! it was actually you who removed the flag from my post i talk about =) Thanks

I agree with this.

My BitConnect post describes the risks and concerns and I replied to comments that I had some issues about the platform and it wasn’t 100% behind it. It wasn’t a promotion, but I had a referral link so I used it.

The honest opinion on it might have been why some people loved the post so much.

You want a 100% ponzi? Control finance. Flag that rubbish!