The Real Solution to America's Immigration Human Rights Crisis Has Never Been On the Table

gun-1371004_960_720.jpg

Today, President Trump signed an executive order to end the separation of immigrant families at the border.

But the separation of children from their parents by ICE--what many Americans on both the right and left have rightly called a "human rights crisis"--is merely the tip of the iceberg.

Most people--especially those with young children--would prefer stay in their home countries if they felt it was safe to do so; if they felt a sense of security and hope for a prosperous future. Wherever you see mass immigration leaving any nation, you can be sure that social, political, and/or economic hopelessness is the driving factor.

And while Central American immigration to the United States has traditionally been primarily economically motivated, that has changed in recent years. Now the most cited reason for immigrating is to escape violence, crime, and instability.

From Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, these people are driven north by terror. Their towns and cities are rife with gang-related (and state complicit) violence. Many of their neighborhoods are controlled by drug cartels and protection rings that offer "services" for a mandatory fee. (Sounds familiar, right?) In order to work, to operate a business, to go about daily life in relative peace, many people are forced to pay criminals who will brutally murder them if they fail to pay. Many families who can't afford to make the trip together send only their children, often in the care of relatives or coyotes, in an effort to save them from targeting by the cartels for recruitment or abuse.

This is the real human rights crisis.

And culpability for the crisis falls squarely on the shoulders of the U.S. government.

How did these gangs and cartels gather such wealth and power, that they can terrorize entire populations of people? While the countries' own governments aren't helping matters any (and in fact are almost always in bed with the gangs on some level), the whole shitty situation arises from the United States government's ridiculous War on Drugs.

Drug prohibition has the economic effect of increasing the profits to be made on the manufacture and sale of drugs to astronomic levels. The high profit comes with high risk of imprisonment, death, injury, and theft, so the criminals attracted to this line of work need to build strong organizations around their enterprises to ensure a modicum of security. As their profits build, their organizations grow until they are not only the richest people in town, but also the most powerful. They must deal violently with rival gangs, including local governments. They branch out into other cities, other states or provinces, and eventually they have de facto control of the entire country.

The United States drug law enforcement is one of the most anti-human rights policies in existence worldwide. Not only does it violate each individual's right to self-ownership by prohibiting us from voluntarily ingesting substances, but it creates reigns of terror in our own and other countries through economic warfare. Because of our drug laws, millions have been murdered. Because of our drug laws, very bad people are able to exert control over entire populaces. Because of our drug laws, people flee their home countries in hope of finding safety and stability within our borders.

And the politicians and their advisors are absolutely, 100% aware of this. If any president over the past two decades had been truly concerned with the human rights of immigrants, they could have ended the drug war with a flick of their pen. If any congress had really cared about the plight of our neighbors to the south, they could have introduced legislation to end this stupidity and watched the immigration "crisis" halve and then halve again.

But they haven't.

The option has never even been on the table.

Oh, sure, in recent years states have started, one by one, to end marijuana prohibition now that the majority of Americans support its legalization. But no one seriously considers ending prohibition of cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamines. The people, because they don't understand that it is the cause of so much death and destruction, and the politicians? Because they don't care.

Trump's new executive order is going to be confusing for a lot of people. Many of those on the left will have to decide whether to support the action, since it was what they wanted done, or to come up with a reason to protest it, since they hate and distrust Trump. And those on the right who previously spoke in support of separating families at the border "because it's the law" will have to decide whether to rescind their support to back Trump, or to argue against the executive order. Congress will go back to debating amnesty packages and expensive walls. And drug prohibition will live on to fuel the next human rights crisis, and the next, and the next.

Transparent-scroll-line-.png

Check out my other recent posts!

No Speech is Free Unless All Speech is Free

On Elon Musk and Post Scarcity Socialist-Anarchism

Transparent-scroll-line-.png

Hi, I'm Starr!

I believe all human interactions should be consensual

27583361_10213307884045035_103049414_n.jpg

I love you, Steemit!

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Good to read your thoughts on this. I am also an anarchist, so I agree that government separating children from their parents is wrong.

I find it interesting that there was a moral outcry about this from the American Left now when President Obama was doing similar things. I hope that people who are left leaning begin to distrust government in general, instead of just Trump's government.

"Other countries are shit because the USA has laws against drugs"

Not the UK, or Canada, or Australia, or China, or Japan... nope. It's totally the USA's fault.

facepalm

Why is this in quotations? This passage was not in the piece. It's a pretty lazy paraphrase.

Japan's draconian drug policies, actually--just in the interest of accuracy--are a direct result of US foreign policy, post WWII.

It's in quotes because it's a summation. Derp.

That's not a correct usage of quotes Mr. Attitude. Being condescending won't get you very far on this platform (or life) but civil discourse, friendly exchange of ideas, and some occasional humor are very effective here. Just pointing this out with the intent of being helpful, take it or leave it.

I wasn't put on this earth to appease your feelings nor am I obligated to conform to your grammatical standards.

Because the UK, Canada, Australia etc have backwards drug laws doesn't save the US. It is a lead dog with many sycophants and imitators, therefore it especially deserves criticism.
The US holds itself to be a democracy and a civilized country, home of the free. Until it can live up to these false claims it should put the Statue of Liberty in storage. Or scrap the metal an recast it as weapons.

I know, I know. Literally everything wrong with the world is the USA's fault.

yawn.jpg

the phrase 'unintended consequences' springs to mind.
or
Perhaps it was intended...the results of prohibition are pretty obvious.

Looking at the border issue can be done from two perspectives, one emotional and the other logically. Emotionally it tears up anyone to hear a child cry, to even imagine a child crying from need for its loved one and protector. From a logical point of view children separated from loved ones by military service, long business trips, or due to felonious activity by a parent caught by law enforcement also cry for their loved ones. Historically open borders have been a disaster for any country that allows it. That's why all countries do not allow it. Looking at any issue using only logic or only emotion never yields a quality solution, nor does it provide a productive platform for discourse.