Valentines day is also known as singles awareness day, or SAD. Also, I was in the pre-planning going to mention that all the boys in my old school were technically victims of sexual battery. The girls used to play kickballs, which basically meant they would kick all the boys they could right where it hurts. But the thing is, we don't cry that the world has ended, and pretend to be traumatized for life. We forget about it and move on.
speaking of which, back in the 80-90s there used to be a show called Americans funniest home videos. It used to routinely feature men getting hurt right in that area too, everyone laughed at it because we empathically reacted to their pain-even if we didn't physically feel it. We knew it hurt as hell, and Funny as hell to watch. Here is a clip of 600 of these injuries in 10 minutes, recently added to youtube by afv
source:America's Funniest Home Videos
hmm, to protect american men's b***s so we should proscribe fishing, sports balls, snowballs, water balloons, yoyos, frisbys, skateboards, ropes, fences, geese, ?pelicans?, dogs, little kids, radio controlled vehicles, toy air planes, bicycles/motorbikes, canoes, hula hoops, chairs, fire sticks/torches, beems/rods/staffs/poles/posts/bats/clubs/fences, playground equipment, trash bins and lids, deer, pigs, geese, goats, cows, horses, elephants, kangaroos,snakes, fish, sharks, bushes, trees, karate, swimming pools, sledding...crabs (1:35)...can't have crabs down there...and so on. goodness, what isn't a heat seeking missile to a man's groin. That's it, I am putting a cup on and never taking it off. hahaha, not. Not even mickey mouse or batman are safe. And they, well they eventually laugh it off or, not seen in these vids, beat the perp up. In this so-called patriarchy we sure are doing a bad job at protecting a man's jewels.
Though some were probably staged, people were all to eager to get the videos of these attacks on t.v. where they could win up to $10k or whatever it was. They didn't wallow in their victimhood crying emotional distress and victimhood for years to come, boohoohooing that an elephant grabbed their junk with his trunk. What an anecdote that must be, and they have video proof-unlike the fish that got away. Granted some women are victims of attempted rape or worse, which is a different story and more extreme case, than mere unwanted s3xual contact. Originally, the punishment for rape in the so-called patriarchy was death. Society never tolerated the crime, society has been forced to reduce the punishment of it...Why? false accusations. Just ask the fictional Atticus Finch about believe all Women. Don't get me wrong, unwanted touching is wrong. It is a violation of a persons body integrity. I would never touch a woman in that manner even if we were married and she was begging for it..save for medical exceptions...and by that I mean like cpr, or to resolve anxiety from a lump or something...not medically as something as evil as trying to having a kid.
But there is a big difference between the genders about our response to unwanted contact of that nature. Women, always having to be the class of people men had to protect, know or have learned that they can use their emotions and narrative to get whatever sympathy, attention, agreements, hugs, support, and material goods they want by letting the tears flow. I don't know the legal history, but if you remove the puritanical issue that unwanted touching is wrong, and we kept the focus on adults: Is it a legal wrong only because when you engage in unlawful touching, especially upon your wife's lady parts, because it is something likely to justify and result in a violent response aka breach of the peace [a misdemeanor]? Yes women [and men] are offended and feel violated when that happens, and I would argue too that they have a justifiable right to engage in a violent response and call for others to do so as well. But something else is going on, women are embracing a victim culture and milking it for all its worth as to entirely negate the potential for a breach of the peace theory but using it instead for social engineering purposes. Excuse me, but if there is no remaining immediate breach of the peace theory, why prosecute? Where are the strong men and strong women to beat the s*** out of those who would so violate a woman-they are no where to be found. Oh, the police, the courts, the judges, they could say. Even the feminist argue that the police, courts, judges, etc aren't doing enough; It is hard to evidence when the danger is no longer imminent and no witnesses or red marks. So they answer believe all women in the absence of evidence; they demand guilt by accusation. Why have a trial court at all since guilt is automatic by accusation? Rather than wallowing in victimhood for years and decades, and trying to destroy the concept of being men and masculinity itself, destroying men with any false accusation, and shredding the constitution. Perhaps we need to, as a society, stop being p ssies where we have to criminalize every violent act or idea. I am a very non-violent person, I'll freeze my body up when attacked rather than defend myself when attacked-I know some people just need to get things out of their system. But we can't be ignorant that even when I am physically attacked, I do have a right to self defense and the failure to so could get me killed. We can't pretend to hide under a veneer and live under a delusion of ideals backed by the criminal law, we have to acknowledge reality exists including that violence isn't always a bad thing.
Back in the 60s where if two boys were fighting, the police would get them a pair of boxing gloves and let them get it out of their system instead of shipping them to juvy. Perhaps one of the last remnant of the honor culture that perished following the civil war after so many people died-the days where people were man enough to handle things themselves without invoking the judiciary for the government to take care of them and be their all powerful shrink at the same time. Since columbine we have adopted a no tolerance practice when it comes to violence or the idea of violence. Kids leaving tackle boxes in their vehicles when they g to school can be prosecuted with a felony and expelled from school if they had a knife in their tackle box. Back in my days, kids would accidentally leave their hunting rifles in their trucks-all they had to do was let the principle know, get it handled, and avoid any trouble. Violence and weapons these days also carries with it an ideological veneer, unfortunately, and have codified harshly through the criminal laws and good people are going to bad places because of the veneer....though not as severely as threatening violence. Threatening a simple battery in Georgia can land you 20 years as a terrorist threat, whereas completing an assault so it is a battery is just a 1 year misdemeanor or 6 months county time-less in some counties. Victims of bullying sometimes end up being prosecuted for standing up to their bully/bullies, which isn't what the law against violence should be used for in the first place. Come on, we all cheer for the underdog teaching his bully a lesson. Perhaps a certain level of violence should be acceptable in every society; violence that doesn't include death, robbery, penetration, serious bodily injury, or restraint unrelated to self defense [construed as false imprisonment]. It would negate most misdemeanor assault and battery charges. The tolerance of certain levels of violence would give feminist what they claim they want too: The prosecution of an alleged sexual assault. Granted, it will be when the harm is imminent and exigent and the punishment will be through an immediate violent response, and not in a court room where there is no evidence other than the testimony of an accusor. Of course this isn't what the feminist want. They need the victimhood culture, they need the outrage culture, they need to throw wild accusations against any man whom they don't like to destroy him or his ideas, they need to destroy the concept of what it means to be a man and masculinity. But what better way to teach a man not to sexually assault/batter a woman, than to immediately beat the snot out of him. Could really get a good a** kicking with a bunch of drunks around at a frat party.
Anatomically women are not men, but they are still part of mankind no matter how much that offends professors these day. Perhaps we need to stand up and show everyone what it means to be a man, to encourage women to learn how to take care of themselves instead of both being dependent upon others and trust the words of any tyrant who proclaims, "I'm from the government and i'm here to help". Perhaps men need to reclaim the law, and wipe away the veneer of criminalizing realities that contrast the ideologies people don't like. The more feminists expand this victimhood culture, the worse it is going to get. They have expanded this now to creating international outrage geared at an autistic teenager for asking for high-fives on a bus. Feminists want men arrested for street harassment for cat calling, then when they get older they muse about how they miss being catcalled. It's just going to get worse if people don't take a stand for reality and individualism. Yeah, feminists should have grown the beep up several iterations ago...just like men have always done. Do you want to be our equals or not? If a guy touches you in a nono area, do what a guy would do....kick his a**, well on the other side anyways. Yeah, guys will quickly learn not to mess with you.