You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: GoodBook.Reviews Beta now Live - v0.2.0
Love it! Here's some thoughts:
- It might be beneficial to indicate what tags the site auto adds. I wasn't sure if it did add any before I tried it.
- I submitted a pull request on GitHub to fix the image not centering. While doing that I was wondering if maybe posts would look better if there was a space between the image and text.
- Do the current posts have enough info to later be implemented into the one book many reviews system? Just curious ;)
- Adding an @ symbol before the author in a posts url would make it easier for bots to parse the url for upvoting.
- I currently run a book review curation bot (@steemitbooks) and if you're interested I would be willing to give you curation permissions that let you upvote posts through Discord.
👊 Thanks for checking out the site and posting.
yes/no - my plan is to add a database in the next update. I plan on using the ISBN as the identifier to link books/reviews (unless you think something else would be better?) I don't anticipate there being many too many reviews that I can't do that manually myself for all upload but also make it possible to edit in future.
I plan on keeping an internal database while still syncing to STEEM to make the whole experience faster. I want all data to be accessible on the blockchain so the library could be rebuilt by any other developer. Anything that's added before the structure is 100% finalised might take some extra work to link up it should always be possible. :)
Thanks again, super useful feedback. Aiming to get the next update out mid week, hopefully using ISBN to pull in data and link authors/books/reviews although it might be a tad ambitions in the time I have.
/review/@author/permlink works fine 😉 all you need to upvote or comment on a post is @author/permlink. The @ symbol lets me parse a url into that easily.