Time to end Qualified immunity, or declare war against the US police state. How the SCOTUS took away your rights
The time is drawing closer between when the people of the United states should declare all out war on the judiciary and the police as they have systematically deprived us of our God Given rights. Your rights come from nature, Nature that was created by God, but the courts have allowed the police to take away your rights through extortion, kidnappings, beatings, and outright murders with impunity. Such abuses cannot be tolerated, and we must consider abolishing these institutions if we cannot get congress to change it for us.
video link and pay attention to it:
https://www.facebook.com/CatoInstitute/videos/10155447065989077/
The people of the United states need to start to take a stand and call upon the congress to end qualified immunity-but lo and behold the police can arrest you for your petitions to do that now too even in writing. They were taken away not by constitutional amendment, not even by the congress, but as the supreme court sides more and more with their thugs depriving us of our constitutional rights. They leave us no route as to assert our constitutional rights, and we can be arrested and brought to financial ruin simply because the government doesn't like the ideas we express even in the absence of a conviction-even when it is clear that our rights are clearly established. The civil rights act was passed after the civil war to ensure a right of action against those state actors who violate our constitutional rights. Originally it was that the state actor violated our rights which is the wording of the statutes (42 usc 1983). A defense was added to that, which says that the rights must be clearly established-something literally impossible in 1871 when the bill was passed. And further defenses were added to that, when a judge can dismiss a pleading by saying that any prudent officer would have done the same thing. Government officials can get away with virtually anything so long as there is no previous case law to that point, even criminal acts, or when a judge decides that it was otherwise ok to do so. These defenses are not found in the constitution, they are complete legal fiction. Your civil rights are your property rights, see the civil rights cases of 1883. The 5th amendment takings clause trumps the doctrine of sovereign immunity, but nonetheless the courts grant sovereign immunity as to states when they steal our civil rights [property] too. Our courts have sold us out to the police [an 1829 foreign invention, which we were not supposed to have], while the 11th amendment as well as article 3 doesn't explicitly prohibit people from suing the states in federal court-that is a legal fiction created in Hans v Liousiana. The courts had just assumed it was there because of the debates in the federalist papers, but if our founders were so concerned about people suing their own states in federal court they would have explicitly put it in the constitution or in the 11th amendment itself after the courts found in Chisholm v Georgia 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793) that a citizen of one state could sue another state. The SCOTUS, selling us out for 150 years.
-from the the show futurama
You hear the mantra, "If you don't like the time, don't do the crime." Well you need not even commit a crime in the police state. You just need to be a person or hold an idea that the government doesn't like, you could simply have the misfortune of being a pawn to advance someones career or the revenues of a corrupt municipality. Even Justice Thomas, someone who has spoken against Qualified immunity, recognizes the abuses of the police state.
These forfeiture operations frequently target the poor and other groups least able to defend their interests in forfeiture proceedings. Perversely, these same groups are often the most burdened by forfeiture. They are more likely to use cash than alternative forms of payment, like credit cards, which may be less susceptible to forfeiture. And they are more likely to suffer in their daily lives while they litigate for the return of a critical item of property, such as a car or a home. It is pretty difficult to hold police accountable. There are another class of 1983 defendants which are not traditional state actors but private parties performing a traditional government function, but it is more technical. Also a state can waive immunity too, but is rarely done. Technicalities aside, see the chart I made below. And after that, it is still a matter for a jury to decide on-in which they may decide no compensation. But so long as a judge justifies a police officers conduct as prudent [or reasonable] in similar circumstances, refuses to admit that something was unconstitutional let alone clearly established, or a town refuses to acknowledge that it was a municipal policy or they claim it was a state, their victim ends up spending literally years more of their life trying to seek a vindication of their rights, and assurances that it won't happen again. and to be justly compensated for their losses....often times finding out they have to foot the legal bills of the defendants. Cops get to hide behind qualified immunity, the states hide behind sovereign immunity even if they became a literal nazi germany and their officers little Eichmans who gets to hide behind the Eichman defense, and all a municipality needs to deny that it is a custom, practice, or police, and the constitution that was supposed to act as a safegaurd to your constitutional rights became an act of legal fiction. Many governmental units may really be a state, not county, unit. Due to force of Government, which is arbitrarily enforced, the people have no rights. Not even when the police break into your home and shoot you dead, the judges will say en banc that they acted reasonably. The opinions granting qualified immunity are flimsy and contradicts reality, and are a great danger to all Americans. I made a first amendment in a legal brief-which is also protected by litigators immunity-and was arrested and held for nearly two year without a bond. I didn't violate any category of unprotected speech, I merely stated the historical reason why we have the freedom of speech in a legal brief. Digest that for a moment, citing making academic arguments as to why a law is unconstitutional can get you arrested. Digest even further that a federal judge said that a police officer who committed the very definition of terrorism has qualified immunity against a person for asserting his rights by legal pleading at the Ga supreme court. Don't risk carpel tunnels and all the research necessary to write up a legal brief or all the money to get a lawyer to do this for you-just pick up that gun and kill a judge because that is the only way these terrorist are going to allow us to have our God given rights. When they know their bad ideas can't be challenged in court, they lock us up, force us to lose everything, and render us homeless. In contrast, the head of an alt-right group, after one of their members mowed down a group of protesters, stood before the protestors in a press conference and made the same historical argument. The police response there protected the speaker. So in another words, basically the neo-nazis or whatever the alt-right spinoff is now has more speech rights than I do; Our own courts think a Nazi's freedom of speech is greater than a first amendment expert. The Remedy is to kill these Nazi Loving bastards, perform a public vivisection of them live on the streets and impale their heads on pikes. Don't get me wrong, a judge who issues a bad opinion is far worse than the ordinary person-An ordinary bad idea can be met with more ideas so that the truth ca be found. A judges opinion is final. The judges and the cops get to walk the streets, while I lost my home, my degree, my reputations, my ability to earn 6 figures a year, stuck with my student loan debts-the full expense of a second degree, to try to obtain a better life and start marketing my software....I would do lucky to find a minimum wage job with all the harm they caused, and having been displaced to an economically disadvantaged area I can only expect shattered dreams and hardships. I have been in litigation for 7 years without a job, while these fuckers get a healthy paycheck on your dime as they continuously violate the law and create more victims. I have not taken one cent from the tax payers, I am not a theif. No, the answer isn't to let the matter go. The answer is to kill them to ensure that the abuse ends once and to send a message to others in the feild. Make the municipalities pay more for the destruction rendered in prosecuting the appeal to heaven than any judgment or settlement could have rendered. To stand up and say no, you can't do that to us and get away with it-that there will be a heavy price to pay. Since the only language they listen to is force as they ignore reason, then force is what you answer these lawless authorities with. But ultimately, that is something i can't religiously do. So ultimately I will flee if the interamerican courts fail, but will prosecute my cause another way. The results will probably be more lethal than if i were to do it just by myself, but I will not be responsible for one life lost. For those of you like myself who prefer peace, you are in great peril if you stay in the United states and petition for change. You are not coward if you leave. In fact that was what I was planning to do before I peacefully petitioned the government, but they chose instead to destroy me. You may think it is easier for the state to abuse the people if you do not stay here and vote for change, you are exposing yourself for abuse and may be one of theirprime targets-not even the attorneys are safe from their wrath and what makes you think you are. Sell what you have and leave, choose a sovereign who will respect your rights and reward them with the fruits of your labor, and divest the dollar. The Leftist will grow and grow in your absence and the numbers of mouths they have to feed will increase as they destroy more and more productive people, but the pool of their harmless victims will decline also. The remnants who stay are the ones who will respond with force to their lawlessness and they will be the ones to lead the way to revolution, and with the best of society gone and nearly insolvent this country will surely fail. It will fail because it has forgotten that our rights come from god, and that it had a duty to protect them-not violate them.The second amendment and the constitution itself means nothing if you do not have the heart to kill another human being; and the reason we have the second amendment is to put to death the lawless authorities who violate our rights when, as in my case, petitioning is not permitted. If you are a cop, fbi, or US marshall reading this-piss off. This post is stored in the block chain, I know you aren't afraid to destroy me and make my life miserable. Everything I said is protected by Brandenberg v United states, " Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. ". But, it is not like you are going to let clearly established constitutional rights get in your way of committing crimes against the people. I know you cannot destroy ideas, you are only capable of destroying peoples lives with force-often unlawful. But you cannot stop my voice, as Ideas are bulletproof. And if my words upset you, then you are too intellectually immature to be enforcing it in the first place.
In one case, local officials threatened to file unsubstantiated felony charges against a Latino driver and his girlfriend and to place their children in foster care unless they signed a waiver. In another, they seized a black plant worker’s car and all his property (including cash he planned to use for dental work), jailed him for a night, forced him to sign away his property, and then released him on the side of the road without a phone or money. He was forced to walk to a Wal-Mart, where he borrowed a stranger’s phone to call his mother, who had to rent a car to pick him up.
They then realize the truth, that our God Given rights have been stripped from us. historically an unconstitutional law was null and void, but today our own constitution has been made null and void as law enforcement given the green light to violate it, and such harm can arbitrarily happen again to themselves or to others. That we have no such thing as a constitution anymore, that the police and the judiciary have declared war against our us and our rights despite the fact they have a duty to protect our rights. We see that the social contract is not enforceable except through the barrel of a gun, and they leave us no choice but to aim our guns at them.
I do not come here advocating violence or war. But to encourage people across this country to tell their congress to abolish qualified immunity, or get the hell out of office. Sadly there are politicians (texas republicans) who want to give more immunity to police-that is an explicit act of war against the people and should never be tolerated. For our international readers, please talk to your statesmen about the plight of human rights across American and the risk of an internal civil war and the global instability that would cause; When Nikki Haley starts talking about defending the human rights of people in poor countries with threats of war, mock her for failing to protect the human rights of its own people and say that is an excuse for the UN to invade the United States. Force this country to adhere to the human rights treaties that it ratified to supporting but never ratified to allow individuals to file complaints. If the United States refuses to deny upon its own citizens our human and civil rights, Consider asking your statesmen declaring a war against the police state in the USA-not to be construed as a war against the united states. The Donald doesn't like our federal courts either, so I am sure he would be ok with it. You need not a physical presence on our soil; simply launch air strikes on this nations courts at night to minimize the deaths of innocence and police stations (and SCOTUS) during the day, and give the reason why these institutions had to be destroyed. Ok, war may be a bit extreme, but as spoken last week, allow you government to file ICCPR claims against the US on our behalf. The failure to do abolish qualified immunity will cause civil war.
-from the movie v for vandetta
some interesting ideas, i think getting rid of sovereign immunity would be interesting, help ensure just compensation is finally paid for all the impingments of government in the name of "public welfare"
You said a mouthful... I am afraid those who need to hear won't take the time, those who took the time already knew the score but thanks for making the effort!
What you have to do to a judge to reclaim your humanity when said judge enters a prior restraint. jump to the 2 minute mark. from the anime, kikaider
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by firstamendment from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.