RE: English - the language of the modern slave
I must point out that the result in both cases you cite, the Cree being dispossessed, and the abused person being denied relief, weren't caused by language. Rather the intention of the ruling parties was to defraud, and language merely became the means of doing so.
The fact is, that no matter how exquisitely worded your petition, if it isn't going to be allowed, it will be disallowed for some other reason.
I will provide an example of this. In the late 80's the Chrystic Institute had amassed proof that the USG was importing cocaine and selling it. They filed a RICO suit against the government that was impeccably sourced, and definitive proof of their claim.
The result was that the plaintiff was fined $1M, essentially destroying the organization, and the CIA kept selling crack. The judge ruled the lawsuit was 'frivolous'.
The courts are the best money can buy.
How's that for serendipitous double entendre?
We are saying the same thing my friend. In my post I stated:
As you supported in your argument, it is the "intention of the ruling parties". Ethics and morality play a huge role. The courts get caught up in the letter and completely miss the spirit! I agree with you and what you shared. Thank you for backing up my point!