You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: UFC in war over fair Salaries
i don't like the 10 point scoring system for UFC. I dont have an answer to how it should be, but i know that the 10 point system can be improved.
In grappling you could dominate the whole round in offense, or you can be a complete shut down using strong defense. Who wins? in the judge's eyes, its the person who was more aggressive. But should that really be the case? or should it be the one who has the best technique and application?
You would need special judges specifically for those types of bouts. and it would easier to judge if you split the fighting styles up.
A split analysis is a good idea. They could have an expert in each area score.
I think that form truly shapes the outcome such that the better grappler will move and bend and punish the grappler with worse technique.
The same in striking any error in form will be capitalized on like Aldo’s tendency to come in too strong would have cost him the fight later on even if he hadn’t ran in in the first 10 seconds vs McGregor.
If neither person can make significant progress, I agree with you I’d think the points would have to be rewarded to the more aggressive fighter not the guarded defender.