You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Anti-Ageing Technology: Will It Prove To Be A Boon or A Curse?
"Disruptive" technology is not necessary to reverse aging. The human body ITSELF is the technology! Take it from me: I've reversed cavities, reversed wrinkles, have zero gray hairs, and in relation to human energy, I've become a child again. Thank you for posting the article; however, I must admit... it is overly complex. As Einstein has said, you must be able to state in simplicity. I'll post again :)
Yeah, the human body is capable of amazing things, almost magical things, but not a lot of people are aware of that or believe that. Even if they do, they are not willing to unlock their potential. I hope in the future, we are more into raising our consciousness and stuff like that.
Watched your 1 month of eating fruit video. I was quite amazed at the results. Maybe I'll try something like that too :)
I wish technology would grant the wishes that people want with health and aging. People are stuck under this illusion that the answer is not inside of them--because this is exactly what has been promoted to them. This article itself feeds into that belief system, and supports that belief system. Instead, let's remind people that they're never going to improve upon nature :)
Glad you enjoyed the vid! :)
I agree with you to the extent that what we think we want isn't what we really need in order to reach our fullest potential of fulfillment (which we DO have with us, always).
That said, the fountain of youth isn't something that can be accessed by self-reflection or meditation. If it's everlasting life in "this flesh" that people are after (whether that's a misguided desire, or not), then technology/ science is the only hope for a solution.
"technology/science is the only hope" -- Like I said, you are the technology. Your body is the technology. You have everything you need :D
Everything I need for what?
For fulfillment? If that's what you mean, then we're in agreement.
If you mean to say that my body is all that I need in order to live forever in this same body, then we don't agree.
instead of trying to draw conclusions to my message, it is good that you have asked :) Your body is everything you need to be in this world, travel this world, and experience this world. It's pretty basic. Wanting to "live forever in this same body" is a temporary greed you have due to you being attached and anxious to this world. Eventually you'll grow bored of it. Besides, it wouldn't make you the first known immortal on this world.
Deep stuff, I know. It's knowledge that is not common or easy to access conventionally.
I would like to say that your body is everything you need for overcoming any health-related challenges. Your body is also everything you need for anti-aging.
Thank you for clarifying a bit.
If I'm to be honest with you, I have no reliable basis to argue with you from, as I haven't found a reliable way nor a sound proof that I even exist (by "I", I mean to say as an individual, separate from other individuals - something obviously exists or there would be no experiencing), let alone what is true or not true about reality.
For instance, do I have freewill? It seems so, from my limited perception (conscious awareness), but it could be that everything I do and say is pre-determined or entirely outside of my control.
That being said, based on my own direct experiences, I agree to some extent what you have said about the human body being capable of achieving far more than the average person gives it credit. However, I don't think that it's sound reason to project that observation into meaning that anything is achievable by the human body, or by any type of meditative (transcendental) state of awareness. How could I ever know if, or where, my limits exist?
Also, I've never directly experienced, or had proven to me, the existence of immortality, so it's not a "truth" to me. Of course, the above doesn't prove that it doesn't exist. Again, I'm left back where I began, admitting that I don't really know anything.
meep
"However, I don't think that it's sound reason to project that observation into meaning that anything is achievable by the human body, or by any type of meditative (transcendental) state of awareness" -- I didn't think that anyone was projecting this. I hear ya.
Your response is extremely reasonable and open. I admire it! :)