You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bizarre Natural Phenomena Vol. 47 - Rainbows In The Night (Moonbows)
Content type: long
Awarded 4 out of 6 owls:
The citation and sources owl was not awarded since it requires in text citations. The originality owl was not awarded since it is only considered when the science behind results/observations are discussed (in a original way). This post focusses on the results/observations itself.
Learn more about the owls over here
Thank you for those cute nocturnal creatures!!
I'm just curious about the citations, there are references at the end of the post, do you mean I should put numbered indicators in my text and number the sources as well?
Yup. I should have been a bit more clearer.
The most scientific way to cite is when you mention a fact to directly give the citation. In that way your work can be easily checked. If you put it at the end then it is not clear where I need to look to verify a specific fact :)
I see, I just don't like the way it looks with the citations in the middle of the text, but your point is absolutely right! :)
I agree this is not very pretty [1]. But science is not always beautiful :)