You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemit Social Justice Warrior Life

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

I really think this is one of the most effective criticisms I've seen from you. The use of sarcasm is superlative, and the lack of offensive words allows the widest spectrum of folks to read it.

I cannot more strongly recommend that you resist the urge to give in to your impulse to offend, because it detracts from your ability to inspire cognitive dissonance in your audience that may be drifting into SJWism without giving it thought. Planting seeds that sprout into reason is the best way to have long term success at promoting reasonable policy, and this piece does it well.

It's super effective!

Thanks!

Edit: so, you just transcribed the video posted by @baah?

While I still admire your incredible fortitude in braving the flaggots, I am stunned that you didn't just link the video. I am really blindsided.

It's not something I would have expected you to do. Now I wonder if you create the memes you post, or if you've written anything you posted here yourself.

You have managed to offend me =/

Sort:  

Here you go, he deserves your compliments:

I cannot thank you enough for this.

All I can do is my max, and say

Thanks!

Hey my bad i didnt leave a steemit parody tag, i thought everyone knew of jp sears.
I thought it was obvious who i was parodying.

Wow, its whatever yo. think what you want about if i made my memes or gifs. lol

other people seemed to know the original so idk if i was right or wrong that it was obvious that it was a parody.

hope the edit on the post and the tag fix remidied it but if not oh well.

sorry but not sorry your offended.
lol

Also jp sears is not baah.
smfh

Loading...

Really, you claimed that you "used to write like that". Glad you caught my joke, obviously I'm not JP, but obviously you thought everyone would recognize a youtube video, because why not think that, while you've claimed to write it, in the comments, again, and again, and again. You're hilarious really.

Laughing at yourself, that self deprecating English humor.

Too bad you cannot take a flag without turning into a SJW and being forced to threaten people with spamming posting a lot of gay porn cartoons of men having sex. So such sad.


do go on i would love to hear more!
:D

I know, you are so pathetic it's really really funny.

snickers.

it's too easy, can't stop, won't stop.

LOL Please, if you only knew what the fuck this asshole did in the past and still denies to this day while blaming the "community" for flagging him, errrm "censoring" him.

Well, I am aware of some of it, both from your own comments and his, earlier.

What I have observed is that @skeptic fought for his account and climbed out of the negative rep, which did censor him.

Censorship doesn't have to be utter and entire. Making your posts invisible is censorship, even if they still exist, and can be found.

I reckon that's admirable, and haven't seen any reason to flag him since I've been a follower. YMMV.

Lotsa folks I follow aren't meek folks that go with the flow, including you. Even particularly you LOL. I kinda like that in folks. I reckon they have the courage of their convictions, while plenty don't.

I don't have to agree with everything someone says to be glad they say it.

Invizible or replaced by a clearly vizible text with a hyperlinked part begging to be clicked to reveal whatever it is that hides, or simply "BUTTON!" muh Censorship.

The dude is downright claiming that Parody means what he did:

1.Parody is just a mimicry of an established concept, idea, or a person and satire is something spoken in humour without reproducing the subject directly.

He didn't parody anything man, he copied it word for word and reproduced the subject DIRECTLY. And it's true, that is liberating, you don't have to agree with what everyone says to be glad that they say it. You do agree more or less that he didn't plagarize or intended to, because he was too dumb to realize that he was even doing that.

Such an experimental thing, half the thread is hilarious, the other half is anger and the last half is trying not to laugh at it all while responding.

Skeptic mimicked the Sears guy, but he did not reproduce Sears work word for word; therefore his work is a parody of Sears work, but a reference to Sears would be preferable and Skeptic has remedied his omission.

FYI, if you understand the definition that you pasted then you should understand that Sears work is satire: he created humour about a sjw without reproducing the sjw directly!

Maybe, instead of being so aggressive, you could have just pointed out, politely, to skeptic that he should reference Sears.

You guys have history, but really, to the casual observer, the way you have conducted yourself in these comments simply smacks of desperation: that you are desperate for him to look bad so that you can look/feel good.

Seriously, can you not see the irony?

SO when he used the exact same jokes, same punchlines, word for word he didn't directly reproduce it. Sears is Parody of SJW, skeptic took that parody and claimed it as his own, not Satire.

Sears was mocking and making fun of SJW by mimicking what they do. What did skeptic make fun of? Sears? Was he Parodying Sears, who was Parodying a SJW? Should really read what Satire is and what Parody is don't you think:

https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/literature/whats-the-difference-between-parody-and-satire

At this point I have to agree with skeptic that your comprehension skills are somewhat lacking. You read a definition and your understanding of it is completely wrong even when given a clear example. Stew in your ignorance or have someone sit down with you and explain it- I give up.

YOu have to agree that what Skeptic did was Parody.

That this is Skeptic's Parody? What examples were given? That he changed Web To Steemit and used every joke in the video as it was said? I'm stewing in ignorance after I've addressed your reply that "duh this is parody" which missed the point that it wasn't skeptic's parody, he didn't mock SJW, JP did. Skeptic didn't make any comedy, you clearly know what "satire" and "parody" are, thats why you took the time to answer to my question/reply to my post instead of Rage Quitting over my completely wrong understanding, here's my post again, for reference to everyone who might be nodding their heads at you and his antics.

Clearly, but it's not his parody, @skeptic didn't write the jokes which are a paroody of SJW

1.Parody is just a mimicry of an established concept, idea, or a person and satire is something spoken in humour without reproducing the subject directly.
That seems lost on some folk, I'm sure that Sears won't like you claiming that This Is Me On Mild from his hard work. They clearly reproduce the subject directly, he's not making fun of JPSears he's using the jokes Sears made and changing meaningless details, which are the same jokes without or with the details changed as they are about SJW either way. He didn't make anything original, he took someone else's work and claimed it as his own while acting as if this can be parody, and if he believe this is parody, that itself is a get out of jail free card because he is ignorant to what copying and pasting plagiarizing is and what parody and satire are.

I should lighten up after you called me a loser and a loner, lmao, project much, I cannot possibly enjoy laughing this much at people not even understanding what copy pasting is and mimicking and mocking is.

He didn't reproduce Joke after Joke word for word, no? LMAO! Nor did he reproduce the subject that sears was Parodying, Satire is what he was doing lmao, he was doing Animal Farm not Scary Movie 3.

No, he didn't reproduce it word for word. Listen to the video and read skeptic's work and you will find that he cut it down considerably and made it more suitable for steemit.
You keep laughing because you need to lighten up.
Expect no more replies from me and feel free to have the last word.

He changed a couple scenery things, and called his parody. All the jokes are JP's not his. Do you understand that JP was making the jokes about SJW, which is PARODY, because he mocks and doesn't care about a deep message, such as a satirical piece. What Skeptic did was take another parody and copy pasted it over here/formated it for this setting, but the subject was always SJW, he wasn't parodying SJW, JP was, he "made it more suitable for steemit". The point is that NOBODY was confused about this being a parody because it's a parody, the point is that if you do indeed listen to the video it's word for word line for line (except he put Steemit instead of Web, and changes some figures around.. lmao and calls it HIS) and you would understand why others have remarked that "it's not parody" and it's very easy to consider what he did plagiarizing.

Thank you for "discussing" instead of furiously leaving me with the last word, because why actually try to understand what is happening outside your assumptive narrative.

BTW I saw Skeptic's parodies before, what this is though is not HIS parody, seems that is quite lost on you and why should I give you the benefit of doubt over satire even, to you mimiking something to make a joke about it and copy pasting jokes that you changed some names around and some scenery are the same thing, no?

you keep posting the the quote but yout dont seem to understand it still.
lol

Parody is just a mimicry of an established concept, idea, or a person

what the hell else would you call the post? i was mimicing the concept and ideas jp sears was making in his original content. that is the definition of parody by your own definition. smfh

satire is something spoken in humour without reproducing the subject directly.

and that was what the original creator of what i parodied was doing.

same with your censorship logic, you do not seem to understand the definition of censorship or just words in general or your willing to ignore them to push your narritive.

censorship is

The suppression or prohibition of information.

it does not matter if it is still there if it has been suppresed it is still censorship.

but please do continue telling us how the definitions of words are what they are.
LMFAO!

Umm it's suppressed even though its Still there. Got it.

LMAFO!
Your understanding of words is amazing pleas do tell us more.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

It's not Threathening people to remove their flags, it's defending myself

Or in this case

Edit: I just want to explain that parody doesn't mean to copy someone's work without attributing it to them. The word for that is plagiarize.

There are folks that would accuse you of plagiarism, and yadda yadda yadda. While I'm agin' it, I don't expect you're lying, so just want to ask that when you do what you are calling parody, you just make a note about where you found it, as you added to this post, and a link to the source.

A parody of a parody

#TIMOM #Paroty

a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
oh Hitchens's razor, now he cant claim im trying to say im Hitchens

please provide links as evidence because you are the holder of the burden by making claims.
a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence

"THUH COMUNNITY!!!!!!!"
LMFAO!!!

Are you dismissing these claims so I can link the threads here, which will probably lead to you defending yourself by making me not post it because you'll spam my comments with gay porn? If you're dismissing these claims then tell me because if you want the evidence I will post the links, make me work for it!

yes i want links to evidence and not the pathetic steemit.com/@skeptic is the link to it bullshit, give actual links to the evidence to back up your claims and i will then provide evidence proving you wrong or full of shit as thats all this has been for the last 8 months with you.

i am getting a good laugh out this desplay of yours.

https://steemit.com/asshole/@baah/the-saga-of-it-s-not-spam-its-posting-gay-memes-on-peoeple-s-posts-until-they-do-as-i-want

Enjoy, there is the train for anyone who cares to follow the Saga of "I'm not threatening, I'm defending".