I really think this is one of the most effective criticisms I've seen from you. The use of sarcasm is superlative, and the lack of offensive words allows the widest spectrum of folks to read it.
I cannot more strongly recommend that you resist the urge to give in to your impulse to offend, because it detracts from your ability to inspire cognitive dissonance in your audience that may be drifting into SJWism without giving it thought. Planting seeds that sprout into reason is the best way to have long term success at promoting reasonable policy, and this piece does it well.
It's super effective!
Thanks!
Edit: so, you just transcribed the video posted by @baah?
While I still admire your incredible fortitude in braving the flaggots, I am stunned that you didn't just link the video. I am really blindsided.
It's not something I would have expected you to do. Now I wonder if you create the memes you post, or if you've written anything you posted here yourself.
Really, you claimed that you "used to write like that". Glad you caught my joke, obviously I'm not JP, but obviously you thought everyone would recognize a youtube video, because why not think that, while you've claimed to write it, in the comments, again, and again, and again. You're hilarious really.
Laughing at yourself, that self deprecating English humor.
Too bad you cannot take a flag without turning into a SJW and being forced to threaten people with spamming posting a lot of gay porn cartoons of men having sex. So such sad.
LOL Please, if you only knew what the fuck this asshole did in the past and still denies to this day while blaming the "community" for flagging him, errrm "censoring" him.
Well, I am aware of some of it, both from your own comments and his, earlier.
What I have observed is that @skeptic fought for his account and climbed out of the negative rep, which did censor him.
Censorship doesn't have to be utter and entire. Making your posts invisible is censorship, even if they still exist, and can be found.
I reckon that's admirable, and haven't seen any reason to flag him since I've been a follower. YMMV.
Lotsa folks I follow aren't meek folks that go with the flow, including you. Even particularly you LOL. I kinda like that in folks. I reckon they have the courage of their convictions, while plenty don't.
I don't have to agree with everything someone says to be glad they say it.
Invizible or replaced by a clearly vizible text with a hyperlinked part begging to be clicked to reveal whatever it is that hides, or simply "BUTTON!" muh Censorship.
The dude is downright claiming that Parody means what he did:
He didn't parody anything man, he copied it word for word and reproduced the subject DIRECTLY. And it's true, that is liberating, you don't have to agree with what everyone says to be glad that they say it. You do agree more or less that he didn't plagarize or intended to, because he was too dumb to realize that he was even doing that.
Such an experimental thing, half the thread is hilarious, the other half is anger and the last half is trying not to laugh at it all while responding.
Skeptic mimicked the Sears guy, but he did not reproduce Sears work word for word; therefore his work is a parody of Sears work, but a reference to Sears would be preferable and Skeptic has remedied his omission.
FYI, if you understand the definition that you pasted then you should understand that Sears work is satire: he created humour about a sjw without reproducing the sjw directly!
Maybe, instead of being so aggressive, you could have just pointed out, politely, to skeptic that he should reference Sears.
You guys have history, but really, to the casual observer, the way you have conducted yourself in these comments simply smacks of desperation: that you are desperate for him to look bad so that you can look/feel good.
SO when he used the exact same jokes, same punchlines, word for word he didn't directly reproduce it. Sears is Parody of SJW, skeptic took that parody and claimed it as his own, not Satire.
Sears was mocking and making fun of SJW by mimicking what they do. What did skeptic make fun of? Sears? Was he Parodying Sears, who was Parodying a SJW? Should really read what Satire is and what Parody is don't you think:
At this point I have to agree with skeptic that your comprehension skills are somewhat lacking. You read a definition and your understanding of it is completely wrong even when given a clear example. Stew in your ignorance or have someone sit down with you and explain it- I give up.
He didn't reproduce Joke after Joke word for word, no? LMAO! Nor did he reproduce the subject that sears was Parodying, Satire is what he was doing lmao, he was doing Animal Farm not Scary Movie 3.
No, he didn't reproduce it word for word. Listen to the video and read skeptic's work and you will find that he cut it down considerably and made it more suitable for steemit.
You keep laughing because you need to lighten up.
Expect no more replies from me and feel free to have the last word.
you keep posting the the quote but yout dont seem to understand it still.
lol
Parody is just a mimicry of an established concept, idea, or a person
what the hell else would you call the post? i was mimicing the concept and ideas jp sears was making in his original content. that is the definition of parody by your own definition. smfh
satire is something spoken in humour without reproducing the subject directly.
and that was what the original creator of what i parodied was doing.
same with your censorship logic, you do not seem to understand the definition of censorship or just words in general or your willing to ignore them to push your narritive.
censorship is
The suppression or prohibition of information.
it does not matter if it is still there if it has been suppresed it is still censorship.
but please do continue telling us how the definitions of words are what they are.
LMFAO!
Are you dismissing these claims so I can link the threads here, which will probably lead to you defending yourself by making me not post it because you'll spam my comments with gay porn? If you're dismissing these claims then tell me because if you want the evidence I will post the links, make me work for it!
yes i want links to evidence and not the pathetic steemit.com/@skeptic is the link to it bullshit, give actual links to the evidence to back up your claims and i will then provide evidence proving you wrong or full of shit as thats all this has been for the last 8 months with you.
i am getting a good laugh out this desplay of yours.
those times when I was such an amazingballs writer before they flagged me for NOT posting gay cartoon porn all over the place. But you know, I'm the one in denial.
:D
lol
This was me on "mild" if you can believe it.
If my account doesnt get killed for this post i might bump the heat up to medium.
cheers yo and thanks for checking it out and commenting!
I really think this is one of the most effective criticisms I've seen from you. The use of sarcasm is superlative, and the lack of offensive words allows the widest spectrum of folks to read it.
I cannot more strongly recommend that you resist the urge to give in to your impulse to offend, because it detracts from your ability to inspire cognitive dissonance in your audience that may be drifting into SJWism without giving it thought. Planting seeds that sprout into reason is the best way to have long term success at promoting reasonable policy, and this piece does it well.
It's super effective!
Thanks!
Edit: so, you just transcribed the video posted by @baah?
While I still admire your incredible fortitude in braving the flaggots, I am stunned that you didn't just link the video. I am really blindsided.
It's not something I would have expected you to do. Now I wonder if you create the memes you post, or if you've written anything you posted here yourself.
You have managed to offend me =/
Here you go, he deserves your compliments:
I cannot thank you enough for this.
All I can do is my max, and say
Thanks!
Hey my bad i didnt leave a steemit parody tag, i thought everyone knew of jp sears.
I thought it was obvious who i was parodying.
Wow, its whatever yo. think what you want about if i made my memes or gifs. lol
other people seemed to know the original so idk if i was right or wrong that it was obvious that it was a parody.
hope the edit on the post and the tag fix remidied it but if not oh well.
sorry but not sorry your offended.
lol
Also jp sears is not baah.
smfh
Really, you claimed that you "used to write like that". Glad you caught my joke, obviously I'm not JP, but obviously you thought everyone would recognize a youtube video, because why not think that, while you've claimed to write it, in the comments, again, and again, and again. You're hilarious really.
lol
Laughing at yourself, that self deprecating English humor.
Too bad you cannot take a flag without turning into a SJW and being forced to threaten people with
spammingposting a lot ofgay porncartoons of men having sex. So such sad.do go on i would love to hear more!
:D
I know, you are so pathetic it's really really funny.
snickers.
LOL Please, if you only knew what the fuck this asshole did in the past and still denies to this day while blaming the "community" for flagging him, errrm "censoring" him.
Well, I am aware of some of it, both from your own comments and his, earlier.
What I have observed is that @skeptic fought for his account and climbed out of the negative rep, which did censor him.
Censorship doesn't have to be utter and entire. Making your posts invisible is censorship, even if they still exist, and can be found.
I reckon that's admirable, and haven't seen any reason to flag him since I've been a follower. YMMV.
Lotsa folks I follow aren't meek folks that go with the flow, including you. Even particularly you LOL. I kinda like that in folks. I reckon they have the courage of their convictions, while plenty don't.
I don't have to agree with everything someone says to be glad they say it.
Invizible or replaced by a clearly vizible text with a hyperlinked part begging to be clicked to reveal whatever it is that hides, or simply "BUTTON!" muh Censorship.
The dude is downright claiming that Parody means what he did:
He didn't parody anything man, he copied it word for word and reproduced the subject DIRECTLY. And it's true, that is liberating, you don't have to agree with what everyone says to be glad that they say it. You do agree more or less that he didn't plagarize or intended to, because he was too dumb to realize that he was even doing that.
Such an experimental thing, half the thread is hilarious, the other half is anger and the last half is trying not to laugh at it all while responding.
Skeptic mimicked the Sears guy, but he did not reproduce Sears work word for word; therefore his work is a parody of Sears work, but a reference to Sears would be preferable and Skeptic has remedied his omission.
FYI, if you understand the definition that you pasted then you should understand that Sears work is satire: he created humour about a sjw without reproducing the sjw directly!
Maybe, instead of being so aggressive, you could have just pointed out, politely, to skeptic that he should reference Sears.
You guys have history, but really, to the casual observer, the way you have conducted yourself in these comments simply smacks of desperation: that you are desperate for him to look bad so that you can look/feel good.
Seriously, can you not see the irony?
SO when he used the exact same jokes, same punchlines, word for word he didn't directly reproduce it. Sears is Parody of SJW, skeptic took that parody and claimed it as his own, not Satire.
Sears was mocking and making fun of SJW by mimicking what they do. What did skeptic make fun of? Sears? Was he Parodying Sears, who was Parodying a SJW? Should really read what Satire is and what Parody is don't you think:
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/literature/whats-the-difference-between-parody-and-satire
At this point I have to agree with skeptic that your comprehension skills are somewhat lacking. You read a definition and your understanding of it is completely wrong even when given a clear example. Stew in your ignorance or have someone sit down with you and explain it- I give up.
He didn't reproduce Joke after Joke word for word, no? LMAO! Nor did he reproduce the subject that sears was Parodying, Satire is what he was doing lmao, he was doing Animal Farm not Scary Movie 3.
No, he didn't reproduce it word for word. Listen to the video and read skeptic's work and you will find that he cut it down considerably and made it more suitable for steemit.
You keep laughing because you need to lighten up.
Expect no more replies from me and feel free to have the last word.
you keep posting the the quote but yout dont seem to understand it still.
lol
what the hell else would you call the post? i was mimicing the concept and ideas jp sears was making in his original content. that is the definition of parody by your own definition. smfh
and that was what the original creator of what i parodied was doing.
same with your censorship logic, you do not seem to understand the definition of censorship or just words in general or your willing to ignore them to push your narritive.
censorship is
it does not matter if it is still there if it has been suppresed it is still censorship.
but please do continue telling us how the definitions of words are what they are.
LMFAO!
Umm it's suppressed even though its Still there. Got it.
LMAFO!
Your understanding of words is amazing pleas do tell us more.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
oh Hitchens's razor, now he cant claim im trying to say im Hitchens
please provide links as evidence because you are the holder of the burden by making claims.
a claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
"THUH COMUNNITY!!!!!!!"
LMFAO!!!
Are you dismissing these claims so I can link the threads here, which will probably lead to you defending yourself by making me not post it because you'll spam my comments with gay porn? If you're dismissing these claims then tell me because if you want the evidence I will post the links, make me work for it!
yes i want links to evidence and not the pathetic steemit.com/@skeptic is the link to it bullshit, give actual links to the evidence to back up your claims and i will then provide evidence proving you wrong or full of shit as thats all this has been for the last 8 months with you.
i am getting a good laugh out this desplay of yours.
https://steemit.com/asshole/@baah/the-saga-of-it-s-not-spam-its-posting-gay-memes-on-peoeple-s-posts-until-they-do-as-i-want
Enjoy, there is the train for anyone who cares to follow the Saga of "I'm not threatening, I'm defending".
I enjoy your contribution, keep on keeping on, and yeah ramp it up a little makes things exciting! ;)
:D
Little by little like the frog in the boiling water, turn the heat up to fast and they jump out the pot.
lol
This was you, LOLOL!
You acting out the post?
lol
those times when I was such an amazingballs writer before they flagged me for NOT posting gay cartoon porn all over the place. But you know, I'm the one in denial.
LMFAO!!!
that's the biggest heading you can make>.>
teach me senpai!
LMFAO!
lick toilets and touch your peepee to the hot stove.