You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Communication in the city

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

Passing ideas to people sometimes is a difficult task. The receivers perception may also hinder them from understanding our ideas.
We have to find a way to communicate to our audience. Find the best form of expression to relate with them, because we have to carry everyone in our audience along. Failure to do this we leave some people out and they may just not find a way to relate with it.
Communication is two sided. When I give, I expect to have a receiver, the receiver is the responder. A responder is that person that got the message. When there is no response at all then this is a yardstick to awaken better forms of expression.

Sort:  

The audience plays a critical feedback role but too often, the presenter is unresponsive unless the feedback that arrives is positive. At Steemit for example, everyone wants to do what they want, the way they want but also want the audience to accept them. This is a social platform and there is always the option to ignore.

Exactly. People want to do their own thing, unconcerned if their thing attracts an audience. If it does not and the blogger is unresponsive to this then with time no one would get to view their posts. This time they will just be talking to themselves because they never get to carry an audience along.