As I understand it, hat 1.32% is the numerical percentage, not the voting weight. The bots listed on steembottracker have a cumulative upvote worth about $4,800. If they all vote at 100%, 10 times a day, that's $48,000 being allocated by 1.32% of the votes cast. I can't remember what the total daily reward pool is, but that sounds like a lot to me.
I would support that, but completely understand why it's not necessarily prudent to point it out. There's a lot of money flowing back to the people who have delegated to those bots. If they think you are doing anything to reduce that flow...
As I understand it, hat 1.32% is the numerical percentage, not the voting weight. The bots listed on steembottracker have a cumulative upvote worth about $4,800. If they all vote at 100%, 10 times a day, that's $48,000 being allocated by 1.32% of the votes cast. I can't remember what the total daily reward pool is, but that sounds like a lot to me.
Wow! Now that's scary. I wonder if @penguinpablo can include the voting weight of bots versus human accounts.
I would support that, but completely understand why it's not necessarily prudent to point it out. There's a lot of money flowing back to the people who have delegated to those bots. If they think you are doing anything to reduce that flow...
Indeed, it would be a suicide mission.