You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Observation and Analysis - Who is the Best Curator 观察与分析之最好的点赞者 🔍
Hey, Brother, You may not know the background of my post.
@paulag tried to use data to show some silly conclusions. I simply want to tell her: Your data are wrong. Go back to check your data carefully, before you jump to any silly conclusions.
I fully understand people use bots to vote and I am ok with it. However, @paulag wants to prove that @surpassggoogle is the best choice for @ned.
My point is: If @surpassggoogle uses bot to vote, why doesn't ned use the @bot directly? Why does he need @surpassggoogle?
Anyway it's @ned's SP. He can do whatever he wants.
Hi @nationalpark, I guess whenever we deal with data analysis it is important to run it past the sniff test/sanity check first, and even as a scientist I miss this sometimes because of cognitive biases that we all have. I was thinking that even if ned wanted to use bots to vote directly, it would still be less biased if he picked someone that might not use the same bots to vote (unless surpassinggoogle uses exactly the same voting bots). Anyway, I guess this is what they mean when they say that with Steem power comes great responsibility :D
👍
Hmmm.. Indeed, I didn't have all the background, it is more clear now. Thanks for your explanation.