You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: steemcleaners is a fake, hypocritical "cleaner" service
If the idea was the stop everyone from reposting, that would be fine, steem would also be nearly empty. I won't be singled out just because I don't cite a FAKE source of a "tumblr" blog as the source of a gif or picture. It's actually worse than simply posting pictures, to citing some fake tumblr blog as the source when tumblr has nothing to do with the actual source/content producers/pay website that was created for those pictures. I was posting my favorite pictures of the day, same as anyone else. Why would another whale bother going back and forth over that? I've been singled out by pepper, I will fight back.
If users want dumps of stolen content there's plenty of subreddits, blogs, porn aggregator sites that satisfy this need - steemit isn't the platform for posting stolen content. If it means that there's less content on NSFW then so be it - that'll mean that actual content creators will get more attention.
If this is the case, why not deny the payout so that you aren't making money on the content?
I assume the whale you're referring to is the steemcleaners? They stand up for small users, combat the aggressive behavior of users profiting from stolen content.
You're not being singled out, you're simply being addressed individually (you're not the only user to be downvoted), given enough time hopefully posting stolen content will stop being a problem across the whole of steemit.
At least faking the source shows some consideration that someone else created the content and that you're personally profiting off their content without forwarding these funds onto said content creators..
"At least faking the source shows some consideration that someone else created the content and that you're personally profiting off their content without forwarding these funds onto said content creators.."
No, you're simply misleading people and directing them towards a blog/etc with more stolen material, and falsely representing that that's 'ok' what kind of a fucking moron are you?
My posts didn't say, Hey - it's me, here are some pictures I personally took of a bunch of different girls. My posts say 'Nice tits of the day/etc' I don't think that's trying to come off as the original producer of the content.
"If this is the case, why not deny the payout so that you aren't making money on the content?"
The whole reason I'm posting is to gauge the interest/potential of steemit and the tips given. Don't give a shit about the 1-2$ that comes in on a post but it's still fun to see, and I won't disable it.
ok well.. your gauge is that the community doesnt like spam. nice experiment???
My point was that by at least faking the source you would be showing at least a tiny shred of effort in attempting to source your material. Obviously you shouldn't fake the source, nor should you steal content in the first place.
If the material you're sourcing is stolen already then perhaps you should source material from elsewhere with permission from the content creators?
Personally it comes off more like 'Check the content I stole, now pay me!'.
You could have done this without stealing content.
it woud be empty..of spam posts you're right! and only original content providers would post and steemit would be being used for its intended purpose!! IT WOULD BE MAGICAL, I AGREE!
Sure, and I would produce better content than your pancake tits, and do produce better content currently than your pancake tits. Unfortunately we live in the real world. Piracy will not stop, sharing will not stop. I'm not posting full length videos or full photosets of pirated material. I was posting some pictures that I thought looked good, personally selected. I'm not a pajeet trying to spam and make 2$, means nothing to me. But I was impressed that I was getting 1-2$ on the posts. Until you ruined it. Now I have a new project on Steemit. Let's see what happens.
but it shouldn't be on steemit is my point since its not what the site is intended for. sharing on the www? go ahead no one can really stop you. but this isnt sharing its making profit off what you post. ergo what you post should be yours or you should set yor posts to not make any $ OR yous hould source yoru posts or you shouldn't make anything.
no one is trying to stop all sharing all over..but on a site that rewards $ for posts? hells ya we should watch plagiarism. a thing like that could take out steemit entirely if the wrong asshole shared the wrong super rich pornstars stuff and she caught wind of it...
Super rich pornstar? You are seriously on drugs and ignorant. I already posted part of the official terms of service, try reading it when you aren't stoned. Though your level of literacy may only allow for pajeet steemit posting "official rules"
There isn't a single pornstar that doesn't have her content shared everywhere, with or without her permission. Your content isn't shared because people don't want it that badly. And you want to be the only one posting on steemit. You are an early adopter, congrats, if steem takes off, you'll be left in the wind behind better camgirls/content producers.
you are again missing the point. it is becoming utterly pointless to talk to you..and just cos pornstars get their stuff stolen from them does not give you the right to steal it as well. that is a fucked way to think of people who create excellent content and deserve credit for it..something you should do on steemit as it is encouraged. and yes I've read it all. you are def violating TOS left right and center..you actually just violated it again in this comment you made.. ><
that third party stuff u are quoting has nothing to do with sources. it just says YOU CAN at your own risk . no one said you CANT. they said you'll be downvoted for not adhering to posting rules [aka sourcing your stuff]