You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What if STEEM POWER wouldn't increase your power?

in #steemit • 7 years ago

You know we already discussed that post yesterday :)

Anyway, didn't they JUST remove quadratic (exponential) voting? I still don't understand exactly what you mean. I'm against people gaining exponentially more power the richer they are, unless the system is waterproof.

7 years ago in #steemit by
$1.47
  • Past Payouts $1.47
  • - Author $1.10
  • - Curators $0.36
2 votes
Reply 3
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    Haha yes :P

    They just removed something similar, quadratic rewards. The purpose of quadratic voting is that more vote power costs more. Quadratic voting is basically the opposite.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago (edited)

      Oh yeah that's exactly what i said yesterday.

      It should literally be the other way around, someone with 100x more money should only have 10 times more influence. And even that is insanely high in it's current implementation because curation quality is completely ignored. A person with 10 times more SP should also be 10 times more critical and should be penalized 10 times as hard for making curation mistakes.

      Let's rename curation mistakes to unreasonable curation :p

      $0.27
      • Past Payouts $0.27
      • - Author $0.20
      • - Curators $0.06
      2 votes
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago 

      Никто никому ничего не должен,..))..вы еще в инет выходить запретите.)))

      $0.00
        Reply