For those that don't approve of voting bots:

I will present the case that @qurator does not have the normal objections that most 'pay for vote' bots could have.

1. as a curation account, there is a live person that looks at the subscribed accounts and shares good, interesting posts that the subscribers have written.
2. therefore, shit posts will be noticed fairly quickly and if one-on-one remediation doesn't work, that subscription can be cancelled.
3. it is not a bot setup as a money grab. The money raised is reinvested and distributed, as upvotes, to more and more minnows to help them and encourage them as the grow.