As I avoid Twatter like the Coronavirus, I have been deprived of this information. It strongly changes my assessment of @ned, who I have previously not seen making false statements. He is clearly misrepresenting this matter, particularly disavowing his personal and professional representations on behalf of Stinc regarding the purpose, use, and justification for the founder's stake. I believe his statements presently border, at best, on criminal fraud, and investors that relied on the assurances that stake would be used for development clearly have cause of action against him personally, and Stinc corporately.

Thank you very much for this eye-opening revelation, and do please continue to add to this wealth of evidence for people like me, who have been led into a false sense of @ned's integrity. My personal interactions with Stinc and @ned were limited, and did not include failures of integrity here revealed.