You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The EIP and how curation will matter again - a.k.a false hopes
I like this idea. Could we add a randomizer? Someone makes a post, it is stamped with a random time between 5-20 minutes. Have the number appear somewhere on the post only a human could read. That would rek autovoters.
I like the voting thing on Tribes. Like Palnet for example. Regardless if you vote on the first second or 2 days later, your rewards are exactly half of the vote you cast. Period. No front running no nothing.
but then there's also no benefit at all anymore in finding and pushing good content to the top?!
Good content will always find its way to the top. But is it really necessary to also race one another for better curation rewards? Because that’s what is happening...always have been...
I wasn't arguing for the timed window, I am totally against the short "competition-window" of 5 minutes.
I was arguing against:
because curation rewards should always be on a curve, in that sense that those who voted first will get more of the curation share for their created rshares than the vote that came later.
Technically that would basically be impossible.
Autovoters could probably scrape the value from the ui.