They are full of shit. If they don't agree with the contents of the article, Wikipedia will just put it down.
And that's the problem. Nobody outside of the Steem ecosystem knows what Steem really is now, and what it was in the past. Youtube videos, Wikipedia and many other "reliable" sources are just happy citing the scandals in the past and the laying of 70% of staff... censorship, deception and lies with an agenda.
Having a Wikipedia article filled with facts would be a good start, but I doubt that they will let us create one that lasts more than a week.
I agree, this is by intention. My 2cs for the reason are:
Wikipedia is a model of telling "politically correct" and filtered truth. Whoever does not believe it, just look at the entry of the Swiss historian and peace researcher Daniele Ganser. After he uncovered some unpleasent truth ("Gladio"), he was blamed an conspiracy theorist to discredit him. Just one example of many.
Wikipedia has NO interest in giving away their monopole. Any decentralized projects where people can pull or share information in an unbiased, censorship-free way is in diametral contrast to their interests. They would not let a fair Steem entry alive, as their many superusers and admins would have no way to control the content.
I know about another example, being about some special biochemistry topic where the debate ended in deletion of a good article on it.
A recent newspaper article mentioned 3,600 incorrect entries at Wikipedia, blaming the issue on how society was 10-15 years ago when a huge amount of new editors joined.
I opt for giving it a try though. There's no plan B.
Steem
STEEM is a cryptocurrency based on the homonymous Steem blockchain, which was created on March 24, 2016 by Ned Scott and the blockchain developer Dan Larimer. With over 1.2 million registered accounts and a daily volume of more than a million signed operations, Steem is amongst the five blockchains with the highest level of activity. In terms of total market capitalization, STEEM is currently ranked at place 40. with a market capitalization of more than 159 million USD. (March 13, 2019).
Hey, I just published an article for Steem in Spanish on Wikipedia. It's an article of 2263 words and I still want to add a lot of things. If it can be translated into English, it would be great. Hopefully this can be very useful in the future. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steem
It's similar to people using "Steemit" for the whole bunch of dapps and frontends and games around the block chain where "Steem" would be more fitting.
I know the feeling, I get so triggered with that. People don't understand that STEEM is not Steemit... One is a blockchain, the other is a platform to access the information on the blockchain.
But I guess that is what we get when we make the entrance barrier to STEEM as easy as it is... All people without blockchain knowledge can join. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I Don't know, especially since this is a proof-of-stake crypto, which means that some of the people with Stake/power on the blockchain don't have any knowledge and shouldn't be making decisions, they should proxy their witness votes.
I'm one of these people with no prior blockchain knowledge and still don't know all the ins and outs of it. But I know one thing: Steemit may have started it, giving us the tools we use - but Steem is what we make of it, warts and all.
I had no prior blockchain knowledge too and still don't know all the ins and outs of it even though I spend pretty much day in and day out researching blockchain tech and other types of tech... The more I know the more I realize I know nothing. Isn't this a saying?
even the english steem(it) article is awfully short. And only focusses on the bad events.
On July 14, 2016, Steemit announced on their website that they were hacked.[3] The attack, according to them, has compromised about 260 accounts. About US$85,000 worth of Steem Dollars and Steem are reported to have been taken by the attackers. Steemit gives small amounts of its cryptocurrency token, Steem, to posters who get upvotes.[4] Posters can also be tipped by readers.[5]
basically this is the core of the article....
The German one is good. I guess the author was one of this community and the english author was clearly biased.
Da liegt ja schon der Hund begraben. Steemit ist nicht Steem, basiert aber darauf. Das wäre ja so, als ob man beim suchen nach "Linse" zum Thema Mikroskop umgeleitet wird. Steem ist viel wichtiger als Steemit, da Steemit ein Unternehmen ist, Steem aber auch ohne dieses Unternehmen existieren kann, nicht aber anders herum.
Vielleicht könnte man eine Löschung vom Steemit Artikel beantragen? Wer interessiert sich schon für Steemit? Nachdem Steemit gelöscht ist, sollte der Artikel auf Steem umleiten. ;)
Die Jungs bei Wikipedia wussten wirklich nicht was sie taten. :D
Edit: Gerade entdeckt Steem Logo
Das ist doch nicht das offizielle Steem Logo oder? Schaut euch mal die Schrift an. xD
Ja genau, ich denke mittlerweile, dass Wikipedia (viele höherrangige User) eher crypto-feindlich eingestellt ist, das ist das eigentliche Problem. Es scheinen überhaupt nicht viele Kryptoprojekte auf Wikipedia gelistet zu sein. Haben wahrscheinlich ein ähnliches Problem, dass sie gelöscht werden. Das Steem Logo ist, denke ich, eine ältere Version, wahrscheinlich von 2016, das sollte wir auch mal updaten. Aber es hat irgendwie keinen Sinn im Moment, wenn es nicht einmal einen Steem-Artikel auf Wikipedia gibt.
I will match with a 100% upvote and 10 SBD for whoever rights a nice wiki article about Steem.
Posted using Partiko iOS
They are full of shit. If they don't agree with the contents of the article, Wikipedia will just put it down.
And that's the problem. Nobody outside of the Steem ecosystem knows what Steem really is now, and what it was in the past. Youtube videos, Wikipedia and many other "reliable" sources are just happy citing the scandals in the past and the laying of 70% of staff... censorship, deception and lies with an agenda.
Having a Wikipedia article filled with facts would be a good start, but I doubt that they will let us create one that lasts more than a week.
I agree, this is by intention. My 2cs for the reason are:
Wikipedia is a model of telling "politically correct" and filtered truth. Whoever does not believe it, just look at the entry of the Swiss historian and peace researcher Daniele Ganser. After he uncovered some unpleasent truth ("Gladio"), he was blamed an conspiracy theorist to discredit him. Just one example of many.
Wikipedia has NO interest in giving away their monopole. Any decentralized projects where people can pull or share information in an unbiased, censorship-free way is in diametral contrast to their interests. They would not let a fair Steem entry alive, as their many superusers and admins would have no way to control the content.
I know about another example, being about some special biochemistry topic where the debate ended in deletion of a good article on it.
A recent newspaper article mentioned 3,600 incorrect entries at Wikipedia, blaming the issue on how society was 10-15 years ago when a huge amount of new editors joined.
I opt for giving it a try though. There's no plan B.
Thank you very much Dan - together with @reggeamuffin we have a way bigger prize now! :)
Holy your 100% upvote is 19$ right now :D
I hope this gives someone motivation to get to writing.
The article is created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steem
Steem
STEEM is a cryptocurrency based on the homonymous Steem blockchain, which was created on March 24, 2016 by Ned Scott and the blockchain developer Dan Larimer. With over 1.2 million registered accounts and a daily volume of more than a million signed operations, Steem is amongst the five blockchains with the highest level of activity. In terms of total market capitalization, STEEM is currently ranked at place 40. with a market capitalization of more than 159 million USD. (March 13, 2019).
I also match with 100% and 10SBD :)
Thank you very much Reggae, together with @theycallmedan you have made the original reward way more!!! I hope it's worth the effort!
Ich lege noch einmal 10 SMSMB-Tokens für den Autor oben drauf.
Was sind das für Token? :D
Die beliebteste Bedeutung ist:
Sado-Maso-Samba-Token.
Mittelfristig kann man dafür beim @smsmb-votebot Votes kaufen, langfristig weiß ich noch nicht was ich damit anstellen soll.
Unglaublich, dass es bisher auf Wikipedia keinen Artikel über die STEEM-Blockchain und nur einen Schrott-Beitrag zu Steemit gibt.
Super, dass dir das aufgefallen ist und dass du die Initiative ergreifst , das zu ändern!
Yea, I have tried 4 times making changes to that wiki page and each time they take it down leave up that article about the 2016 hack
Hm, sounds stupid :( I hope we can get beyond that somehow! I will try to write the german one tomorrow, let's see if it is easier there!
Yikes! What the heck is up with that? Censorship much?
Try Everpedia.
Hey, I just published an article for Steem in Spanish on Wikipedia. It's an article of 2263 words and I still want to add a lot of things. If it can be translated into English, it would be great. Hopefully this can be very useful in the future. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steem
(I also just made a post where I talk about the work done) : https://steemit.com/steem/@flaws/steem-en-wikipedia-steem-on-wikpedia-mantengamos-esta-realidad
It's similar to people using "Steemit" for the whole bunch of dapps and frontends and games around the block chain where "Steem" would be more fitting.
This is something that frustrates me so much!
Posted using Partiko Android
Exactly - and even if you talk about it some don't understand what's the difference or care about it.
so true, i dont even use steemit
I know the feeling, I get so triggered with that. People don't understand that STEEM is not Steemit... One is a blockchain, the other is a platform to access the information on the blockchain.
But I guess that is what we get when we make the entrance barrier to STEEM as easy as it is... All people without blockchain knowledge can join. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I Don't know, especially since this is a proof-of-stake crypto, which means that some of the people with Stake/power on the blockchain don't have any knowledge and shouldn't be making decisions, they should proxy their witness votes.
I'm one of these people with no prior blockchain knowledge and still don't know all the ins and outs of it. But I know one thing: Steemit may have started it, giving us the tools we use - but Steem is what we make of it, warts and all.
I had no prior blockchain knowledge too and still don't know all the ins and outs of it even though I spend pretty much day in and day out researching blockchain tech and other types of tech... The more I know the more I realize I know nothing. Isn't this a saying?
$rewarding 100% 13min
Gute Aktion, ein vernünftiger Wikipedia Artikel wäre gut für Steem.
even the english steem(it) article is awfully short. And only focusses on the bad events.
basically this is the core of the article....
The German one is good. I guess the author was one of this community and the english author was clearly biased.
habe gerade die Seite angelegt, eigentlich überarbeitet, da es ein Redirect auf Steemit war. Anscheinend hat es früher schon mal einen ganzen Artikel gegeben, aber jemand hat ihn gelöscht und einen Redirect auf Steemit gemacht, was schrecklich ist. https://steemit.com/steem/@vikisecrets/let-s-bring-steem-to-wikipedia-i-just-created-this-stub-for-steem-on-wikipedia-let-s-expand-it
Da liegt ja schon der Hund begraben. Steemit ist nicht Steem, basiert aber darauf. Das wäre ja so, als ob man beim suchen nach "Linse" zum Thema Mikroskop umgeleitet wird. Steem ist viel wichtiger als Steemit, da Steemit ein Unternehmen ist, Steem aber auch ohne dieses Unternehmen existieren kann, nicht aber anders herum.
Vielleicht könnte man eine Löschung vom Steemit Artikel beantragen? Wer interessiert sich schon für Steemit? Nachdem Steemit gelöscht ist, sollte der Artikel auf Steem umleiten. ;)
Die Jungs bei Wikipedia wussten wirklich nicht was sie taten. :D
Edit: Gerade entdeckt Steem Logo
Das ist doch nicht das offizielle Steem Logo oder? Schaut euch mal die Schrift an. xD
Ja genau, ich denke mittlerweile, dass Wikipedia (viele höherrangige User) eher crypto-feindlich eingestellt ist, das ist das eigentliche Problem. Es scheinen überhaupt nicht viele Kryptoprojekte auf Wikipedia gelistet zu sein. Haben wahrscheinlich ein ähnliches Problem, dass sie gelöscht werden. Das Steem Logo ist, denke ich, eine ältere Version, wahrscheinlich von 2016, das sollte wir auch mal updaten. Aber es hat irgendwie keinen Sinn im Moment, wenn es nicht einmal einen Steem-Artikel auf Wikipedia gibt.