Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago 

    I'm calling bs.

    [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    2 Increasing the percentage of rewards that are distributed to curators. One of the problems with Steem as it stands is that there is a strong incentive to self-vote. The more rewards are distributed to curators the less incentive there is to self-vote. At the same time, if curation is improved, then those content creators who are currently submitting great content which isn’t getting seen, should stand to benefit as that content will be more likely to get unearthed.

    Source:
    https://partiko.app/@steemitblog/improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal

    It is bs.

    [-]
     6 years ago 

    Lol, can we have the 4 post limit, the n2, and a 500mv influence cap back?
    With those in place i might sympathize with the authors earn too much camp.
    This hf might be the straw that topples the structure.
    Look at golos, these same people controlled them to .01usd only on bitshares.
    Geniuses, smdh.

    [-]
     6 years ago 

    That is my worry, this one being the Steem killer, yet not coming from the outside, but from the inside. And I really question the weird 50-50% payout split, it does not make any sense to me.

    The Steem proposal part, I do think is a great addition. Now there might be a chance to change things differently.

    Still hope this will turn around for the good at one point.

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02
    • - Author $0.01
    • - Curators $0.00
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago 

    Yeah, I still got hope, too.
    Hope dies last.

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.00
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago 

    Is it 33 % less or 33% more than on an other platform ?

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago (edited)

      33% less compared to before HF21, on this platform, that is where we are.

      $0.00
        Reply