You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem could transform scientific research culture - making research free, fun, legal and profitable!

in #steem7 years ago

For quality, the ideal concept would simply be the curators, the self policing from a democratically voted group of quality checkers - an advanced steemSTEM. The problem then however would be more emphasis on objectivity, since we currently vote on objectivity first, then subjectivity based on creativity, style etc. A blog could succumb to subjectivity but the paper itself should have some objective minimum payment. I guess...

After the experiment is completed, the final paper with the results is published.

I would put a stepp between this end and include a post about a progress report to show they're adhering to the methodology agreed upon. This is a good adaptation of my idea, making it more present tense, whereas mine was more trying to reward already completed products.

It brings to light a whole new wave of ideas!

Try harder to come up with a worse idea next time

Now this I can do =P

Sort: