You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The unfair practice by @therealwolf associated with @smartsteem

in #steem5 years ago (edited)

the pictures may be yours, but you're still just farming the reward pool to extract as much value from the platform with as little effort as possible...

you cannot imagine how pleased i am to see you bickering about not making the ROI you've been hoping for

Sort:  

the pictures may be yours

The thing is, they are not his, we have gone over that a few times in the past. He works with weddings, gets photos from other photographers for something in his business but has no license to post them online for profit. Not even convinced he has rights to use them in his business or that he has one.

he does run a small wedding-planning business with a small team under him, I've confirmed that and for myself and have no reason to doubt it. I agree that it's very unlikely he's taking these pictures himself but I would argue that he does have permission to republish them.

a lot of the images can be found on the web as various location-catalogues on the web present those same images as uploaded by the venue operators, too

really though, I don't even see why that matters so much, the behavior of squatting a variety of trending categories with this minimum effort "original" content via bid-bots should be enough reason to flag his content and ultimately blacklist him from the bid-bots

this really isn't so much an issue about copyright as it is about abusive behavior towards the platform's twisted economics

He's confirmed he doesn't take them himself nor does he have a license to sell them or make a profit off them.

¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

@themarkymark
Do you have the license to right any things without having proof. Then what happens with @magicdice.
We always not rights, someone can be right.
By the way this is not the point of discussion here, the point is that how @therealwolf reacted for query.
You can right in your thoughts but truth may different.

Here, not is the question of ROI. Here quesion is that how @therealwolf communicate, behave and take action. He is a witness. You also knew that i difference in ROI doesn't effect my efforts. I knew this happens, but how he reacted is wrong. ROI ±5%, downvote i don't worry for that. I do my work without wrong wording and action. You can say, you did not like my bidbot action. But this post is for his action and communication as a witness.

well... if you couldn't make ROI with these bid-bots... I'm pretty sure you wouldn't post anything at all...

we all know you don't put in much effort anyways, but I'm still certain a lack of ROI would impact your barely made efforts... which would be a good thing for the ecosystem... because you'd stop farming the reward pool!

if free votes is available, no one want to pay for it. Stop bidbots or voteselling, i am very much happy.
Make a post have losts of efforts, get a photo from site, make a post, it require min 2-3 hours of work. Than you received 0.10 $ vote, what should you do. All are selling their vote. So i finally think for buying the votes. If it's available free i will be happy. I need not to sent post in trending. Only 10-15 $ post is good. It will serve the purpose.

Sure, if someone gave you money for free you wouldn't need to pay for ROI. That makes a lot of sense!

How about creating quality content, boosting that to trending to get attention every once in a while, and then receive some free votes and genuine followers because people actually enjoy the content.

That's the only legitimate scenario for bid-botting, everything else is reward farming, at least that's how I see things.

Your whole argument just underlines the fact that you don't care for the content but you just want more tokens.

I think you are genus and minded, you knew the things. You are a 100% true person. Enjoy steeming. Your each word is true and correct. I fan of you.
Thanks for all and keep voting me up and down, it's upto you. But all you knew the things correctly.