RE: Correcting Bloomberg's Wrong Interpretation Of Things: Steem Doesn't Have A Content Quality Problem!
Steemit seems to be an experiment in Game Theory.
Unfortunately, with close to 1 million users, it's more of a game of Whac-a-Mole. But it will be a never ending game that I don't know if the steemit team can keep up with.
Every time that a fork has happened, there has been a short grace period before users figured out to game the system again using the new rules.
For example, some have recommended that witnesses be given more power to help battle the bots and the spammers. So ... if that happened, the bot owners would become witnesses etc etc.
Steemit seems to be a fantastic representation of society. Noone wants to be governed, yet without government, the many ideals of what a "good society" oppose each other.
If there were an easy solution, I imagine that society would have adopted it in the real world. Until them, we will continue to have Communism, Democracy, Dictatorship, Republics, Anarchy etc etc And each form of system will all believe that they are the "best"
These are very wise words.
That's true.
The big question is if we'll be able to create something that is even better than real world?
PS: We're not 1 mio users, we're 1 mio accounts and less than 60,000 active users :-)